Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)
71–80 of 190 posts
Re: Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)
#72These were the years of the GeForce 4 and the brand new amd64 processor. The Direct X version supported by GeForce 4 couldn’t even display the real pretty water textures at that time, or at least mine couldn’t on my GeForce 4 + amd64 laptop. Little guy was a beast back then. Compaq, I think? That game was so good and around that time, people were figuring out how to get HL2 to be multiplayer in story mode, and gmod w…
I recall the Radeon 9800 Pro was being sold for about US$300 and came with Half-Life 2, which was designed for it. Doom 3 was out at the same time and was optimised for NVidia cards. It was a sort of "battle of the graphics platforms", both hardware-wise and software-wise. And now two short decades later we're paying 10x the amount for top-tier cards, and HL3 still isn't out.
Re: Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)
#73That's odd - I'm sure I remember completing that survey - and I was playing on Mac, but there are no Mac stats.
Re: Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
> came with Half-Life 2 I think mine came with Vietcong, which was... underwhelming.
Is that the game that had this in its soundtrack? https://youtu.be/fuYL-keoGvU I still listen to it on occasion. Don’t even remember how I found that song because I’ve never played that game, I don’t think.
Re: Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)
#75The Geforce 2 MX and (to a lesser extent) Geforce 4 MX were spectacular little cards for the price when they came out, I'm not surprised they occupy first and third place in the Graphics card rankings. Also I am curious who was running Steam on a computer with <24MB of RAM in 2004, that seems ... odd.
Re: Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)
#76Amazing how cpu clock speed seems not out of place at all, while the rest seems so out of date (like 56k modems)
A 2000 to 2005 ish pentium might have 50 to 200 million transistors, an M1 Pro is more like 12 billion.
Re: Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)
#77Amazing how cpu clock speed seems not out of place at all, while the rest seems so out of date (like 56k modems)
Interesting, let's take a look at the instructions per clock. Oh, yikes. https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Pentium-4-380GHz...
Re: Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)
#78These were the years of the GeForce 4 and the brand new amd64 processor. The Direct X version supported by GeForce 4 couldn’t even display the real pretty water textures at that time, or at least mine couldn’t on my GeForce 4 + amd64 laptop. Little guy was a beast back then. Compaq, I think? That game was so good and around that time, people were figuring out how to get HL2 to be multiplayer in story mode, and gmod w…
Re: Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)
#79These were the years of the GeForce 4 and the brand new amd64 processor. The Direct X version supported by GeForce 4 couldn’t even display the real pretty water textures at that time, or at least mine couldn’t on my GeForce 4 + amd64 laptop. Little guy was a beast back then. Compaq, I think? That game was so good and around that time, people were figuring out how to get HL2 to be multiplayer in story mode, and gmod w…
The GeForce 4 MX (first in the list) was a rebranded GeForce 2, so just T&L and no shaders. The "real" GeForce 4 (second in the list) supported shaders just fine, as did the GeForce 3, so it got the pretty water.
Re: Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)
#80Take a moment for the 32k people using Windows Me. We will remember them.