Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Bloben – Self-hosted web CalDAV calendar client

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 18 posts

Show HN: Bloben – Self-hosted web CalDAV calendar client

#1
Hello all,

I have been working on a self hosted CalDAV calendar client Bloben https://github.com/nibdo/bloben-app

This is mostly an alternative to other web clients like great AgenDAV with some additional features I wanted to use like email invites, alarms, webcalendars, etc.

You can play with demo (limited to read access) here: https://demo.bloben.com/api/v1/users/login-demo?username=dem...

In the end it should provide separate clients also for CalDAV tasks and notes.

One thing I would maybe like to discuss more is adding encryption, which is obviously quite problematic when using standards like CalDAV. Initially I just added non-compatible fully encrypted calendars, but realised this might not be useful for many people using different clients.

Something halfway is adding an option to protect only some, say sensitive, events by encrypting fields like title, description or location. That way events will still be displayed via standard mobile apps and decrypted only in Bloben client (with link to open from description).

As part of this project I published also React calendar component https://github.com/nibdo/kalend

Thank you, if you are interested and feel free to ask me anything.

Re: Show HN: Bloben – Self-hosted web CalDAV calendar client

#7
post #4

I allways wonder how secure caldav is, when exposed to the internet without vpn? (Running on Synology)

I mean, assuming you run the server for this app on the same LAN as your CalDAV server, you don't have to directly expose it to the internet.

That said, my Radicale server is exposed to the internet, and I haven't had any issues. The *DAV protocols are mostly just HTTPS requests with Basic Auth.

Re: Show HN: Bloben – Self-hosted web CalDAV calendar client

#9
post #8

Clickable link to project on Microsoft Github: https://github.com/nibdo/bloben-app

Did Microsoft pay you to say Microsoft Github instead of just Github?

I am guessing it is the opposite - they are trying to point out that Github being owned by Microsoft is bad thing.
Post reply on HN