Live data from Hacker News

Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)

web.archive.org

21–30 of 190 posts

Re: Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)

#21
post #3

Amazing how cpu clock speed seems not out of place at all, while the rest seems so out of date (like 56k modems)

Interesting, let's take a look at the instructions per clock. Oh, yikes. https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Pentium-4-380GHz...

36% better memory latency.

Four times the single core performance.

Two decades.

Re: Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)

#22
I have nostalgia for the games of that era far more than the hardware. While the hardware has come leaps and bounds, the gameplay has gone backwards. Take battlefield as an example; back then it was a tactical team-based shooter, today it's a gallery shooter. Same thing with the Crysis series; every entry got dumbed down.

Re: Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)

#23
My dad bought me HL2 back in Nov 2004. At the time my PC spec was: P4, 512 RAM, GF FX5900XT, HDD 80Gb, Dial up 56k, LCD BenQ 1280x1024, Win XP.

The game was in English and I didn't speak it at all at the time so had to download the translation (700Mb audio files). Took me a couple days. With constant disconnects as dial up wasn't really reliable. Luckily, Steam allowed you to resume the download.

Still using that Steam account.

The game ran well. Although, my friend had Radeon 9600 Series and it performed noticeably better on his PC (or maybe I'm confusing it with a different game - Far Cry).

Re: Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)

#24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interesting, let's take a look at the instructions per clock. Oh, yikes. https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Pentium-4-380GHz...

36% better memory latency. Four times the single core performance. Two decades.

It's not much compared to the two decades of 1980-2000, but it seems there's nothing interesting on the horizon for 2010-2030.

Re: Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)

#25

These were the years of the GeForce 4 and the brand new amd64 processor. The Direct X version supported by GeForce 4 couldn’t even display the real pretty water textures at that time, or at least mine couldn’t on my GeForce 4 + amd64 laptop. Little guy was a beast back then. Compaq, I think? That game was so good and around that time, people were figuring out how to get HL2 to be multiplayer in story mode, and gmod w…

>The Direct X version supported by GeForce 4 couldn’t even display the real pretty water textures at that time, or at least mine couldn’t on my GeForce 4 + amd64 laptop.

If I remember correctly you needed Shader model 3.0 support to get those fancy graphical effects which required GeForce FX series & 6th Series (6600/6800 etc).

Re: Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)

#26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> came with Half-Life 2 I think mine came with Vietcong, which was... underwhelming.

Nope, I got a 9600XT, and it came with a serial number for HL2. I added a Zalman cooler on top of that card, and it was both silent and stable.

I guess it depends on who made the card? Probably Sapphire and MSI and others had different bundled stuff (maybe also different by country, and I'm in EU)

Re: Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)

#27

Very curious what the rest of the setups looked like for the 0.02% of people with a 1920 wide screen display back then…

Google tells me the Apple Cinema displays came out around this time as well, so surprised there aren’t more 2560 wide users.

Valve added macOS support somewhere around 2009 if I recall correctly.

I imagine a number of people with Apple Cinema display connected to their PC would be really limited.

Re: Steam: Half-Life 2 Hardware Survey (2004)

#30
The Geforce 2 MX and (to a lesser extent) Geforce 4 MX were spectacular little cards for the price when they came out, I'm not surprised they occupy first and third place in the Graphics card rankings.

Also I am curious who was running Steam on a computer with <24MB of RAM in 2004, that seems ... odd.

Post reply on HN