Not commenting on tailscale, but for the state of databases. Sometimes boring is the right choice. PostgreSQL has worked for decades now, and seems to have regained much of the performance that MySQL once boasted. If you do this for the money, investing in tried and true (but boring) software should be the default solution. I watched with dread how the MongoDB fiasco played out a decade ago. Meanwhile, I kept using P…
You say 'sometimes', I think it should be the default position. When you want to deviate from the boring software and technology, there must be a very sound 'business case' for it. If you are building a planetary scale business, OK, maybe that warrants something more fancy. But how many companies really need that? I'm not limiting myself to the HN unicorns, but looking at the whole market.
> If you do this for the money, investing in tried and true (but boring) software should be the default solution.
Meaning if you are just playing around, then by all means evaluate new and shiny stuff.