Live data from Hacker News

Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

nytimes.com

521–530 of 785 posts

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#521

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I like the idea of unions more than the reality. My first job was earning minimum wage working full-time at Safeway. After working there for about 9 months I quit because I didn't want to pay union dues to join the union. I was already only making minimum wage, it wasn't like the union was improving my salary. The required hour long lunch breaks might have been thanks to the union, but I hated having to take hour lon…

You cannot have optional and union in the same sentence, that defeats the purpose of a union. What you are saying is I want the union to do all the work without me being hands on on its function. Unions are useless if the workers just sit idle and wait for the representatives to do all the work. Participation of all workers is what make a union powerful.

Works for Boeing.

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#522
post #103

A single successful effort of unionization at an Amazon facility is more than symbolic: It will encourage -- and serve as a blueprint for -- employees at other Amazon facilities to do the same. Moreover, it will motivate employees at other large companies to try. This has been brewing for a while. It's possible we'll see a generational wave of unionization.

I want you to be right, I really do. The problem as far as I can see it is that Amazon can simply shift the work load away from that facility and then close it, and open a new one somewhere else. Unions no longer have the protections they need. Technically, Amazon could simply shut down that facility for 1 year and 1 day, and then reopen it and the Union will no longer exist. I have serious doubts about whether Amazon cares about the negative press they would get for doing exactly that.

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#523
post #103

A single successful effort of unionization at an Amazon facility is more than symbolic: It will encourage -- and serve as a blueprint for -- employees at other Amazon facilities to do the same. Moreover, it will motivate employees at other large companies to try. This has been brewing for a while. It's possible we'll see a generational wave of unionization.

> It's possible we'll see a generational wave of unionization. I fully expect this to happen. Younger folks today are the unlucky beneficiary of years of wage stagnation and home price inflation. They have every right to be angry, and I think they are collectively starting to realize that they have a lot of power to change the status quo. At the risk of veering into politics, I'm also not sure how this will change th…

Neither side can really claim it, but both will half heartedly do so.

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#524

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think Amazon wants to shut this warehouse down, my rough understanding is that it's a hugely important warehouse, serving NYC's millions of customers.

I know people and it’s already in shut down mode. Do you really think they designed their infra to be that vulnerable? It’s time to make a point and turn the community against the agitators. They destroyed good jobs.

> make a point and turn the community against the agitators.

Time and time again this is the proven strategy.

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#525
post #50
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Should also have the right to work at a company and NOT have to join the union, and negotiate your own conditions / wages independently.

This is a textbook example of loosing at the prisoner's dilemma due to selfishness. The only way you get a better contract then the union is if the company intentionally does it to spite the union.

[deleted]

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#526
post #455

I really don’t understand this push tbh. Amazon is already the industry leader in pay and benefits for these roles. Why was this needed? In 2022, the only time I tend to see a union do anything, it’s to disrupt and create mob like holds on things (shipping, trucking etc). There seems to be waaay more corruption in anything union related than without. Can someone seriously explain why this is needed or a good thing? W…

Pay and Benefits are one thing. Working conditions are another. You can pay me 15 an hour (Only $30K a year) but if I have to pee in a bottle or don't have enough schedule consistency to see my kids it's not worth it. Amazon may pay well for now, but let's be honest, Amazon is a monopolistic project. What happens when there's less competition than there is right now? Do you think wages stay where they're at without s…

> Democratically run unions give employees real negotiating power over what it means to go to work day to day.

I've been part of a few and this has never been the case in my experience.

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#527

> Employees cast 2,654 votes to be represented by Amazon Labor Union and 2,131 against, giving the union a win by more than 10 percentage points, according to the National Labor Relations Board. More than 8,300 workers at the building This is just sad. Just a hair over 50% of the eligible voters voted; weirdly, approximately the same voter turnout for US elections historically. Does half of any given population just…

Perhaps roughly half of the eligible voters correctly estimated that the chance of their vote affecting the outcome is exceedingly low and that the cost of voting (even if it's just a few minutes of time) is not worth that small chance of affecting the outcome.

Or scared of repercussions for voting one way or the other, from employer on one hand or peers on the other.

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#528

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It might, but they would have to be big enough to break the "conservative" alignment of resource extractors, religious fanatics and rich people. It's definitely possible in 10-20 years.

Outside of Bernie and a few others, the days of Democrats having many nationally significant politicians that are truly pro-union are pretty much gone. I don't think most people, including those that vote Democratic, have much of an illusion of the Democratic party as a friend of labor anymore. Sure the Republicans actively try to dismantle all worker protections, but the Democrats mostly stand by and say well what c…

The parties are symbiotic.

The big tent of the Democratic Party wouldn’t exist without the regimented command & control model of the Republicans.

Personally, I think that you’ll see party platforms shift as the current cohort of old people die off and their replacements are poorer and angrier. The parties of 1920, 1960, 2000 and 2040 are and will be different things.

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#529

A good news for anyone work inAmazon robotics branch, I guess?

I remember all these promises of how quick tech bros would be able to automate minimum wage and so-called “unskilled” jobs. Now for the past 18 months every Subway sandwich shop (and the like) in my area is begging people (not robots) to work. I wouldn’t be betting on robots just yet.

McDonalds where I am has automated and now sometimes doesn't have someone at the counter

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#530
post #519

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Neither of the two parties represents anything close to a small-government platform.

I agree. So, the question is if you want lower spending etc, who do you vote for? It’s not obvious. Take a corporate tax loophole, is that spending and or a form of economic control? Foreign ownership of US companies compounds this, is it giving money to foreigners or good economic policy etc.

> Take a corporate tax loophole

Tax policy you disagree with isn't a loophole.

Post reply on HN