Live data from Hacker News

Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

nytimes.com

81–90 of 785 posts

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#81
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's a textbook run-on sentence.

I don't think its a run-on at all, let alone a text book one.

It's definitely not. People have just gotten used to very short and simple sentences, these days. Some would call a high percentage of all sentences written before, I dunno, 1970, run-on sentences, plus a good deal of the writing in contemporary but non-general-audience publications.

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#82
post #75

This is fantastic news. Well done, Amazon employees! I'm glad to see that Amazon's anti-union propaganda was taken for the nonsense that it is. Hopefully the employees of other Amazon warehouses will be inspired to do the same, after this win for workers.

HN is not a political forum. I get that we like to talk politics here, and that's all well and good. But having someone make a brand new account to make a political opinion post that has little to no intellectual content seems like it should be unwelcome.

Given that many people are likely putting their jobs on the line by voicing support for unions, it’s unfair to forbid new accounts from taking place in these discussions.

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#83

okay this is amazing. but wtf is this sentence? "No union victory is bigger than the first win in the United States at Amazon, which many union leaders regard as an existential threat to labor standards across the economy because it touches so many industries and frequently dominates them."

That's someone who doesn't want to use short sentences, and an editor who wants to watch the world burn.

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#84
post #39
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What seems to be the problem?

I assume it's because you could read it as: the union leaders view this big union victory as an existential threat to labor standards. (When instead they view Amazon as the existential threat)

I disagree that any reasonable person could read it that way. It's totally impossible to come to that conclusion with the context of the article. Even out of context, it makes no sense that union leaders would feel a union victory is an existential threat to labor standards.

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#85
post #9

It's great that people are standing up against the abusive power of big companies. When will Apple (App Store) developers unionize?

Why should developers unionize? I love not being in a union. If my company starts dicking me around I'll quit and find another job. Besides, if I do something so bad my boss wants to fire me, fine then I'll go work somewhere where people want me. I don't want to have to bring in my union rep to argue about it since going somewhere else means losing my tenure and taking a 30% pay cut. The only time unions make sense i…

That's just blatantly false, unions absolutely make sense for skilled labor. This isn't to say tech workers should unionize, but teachers, public defenders, subway engineers, high skill building trades, skilled workers in film are all unionized.

Unions provide a ton of value if you're a skilled worker who does something comparable to gig work, jumping from jobsite to jobsite where the Union helps them keep their health insurance. It also helps when your job also has other political implications.

The context tech workers should unionize would be in an instance where they job hopped even more often than is currently the case, and also potentially on teams where you become just so specialized that switching companies becomes difficult.

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Once you acknowledge that unions are useless and bad, yes, this is correct. If unions were actually beneficial to workers, then companies would have a very hard time hiring non-union workers.

In what way do you believe unions are useless and bad? That's like saying "companies are useless and bad" - some companies may be useless and bad, but you'd need to show an essential reason why the majority must end up that way. FWIW, I think you're wrong and that unions are good at improving worker conditions and pay, and that's why companies engage in aggressive union-busting and anti-union propaganda to prevent un…

Unions are definitely bad for companies, but the fact that companies don't want them doesn't automatically mean that they're good for workers. They're a parasitic drain that's bad for both.

Also, with the sole exception of Japanese bus drivers, every union I know of that's ever gone on strike has, in doing so, used innocent third parties as collateral damage.

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#87
post #55

Can Amazon now just shut down that warehouse and fire all the workers? It would seem like a sensible business move, even if it involves a little bit of service disruption for users in New York.

Are you advocating this course of action?

It seems like somebody like you has to pop in and imply (accuse) a commenter of being anti-labor or whatever, whenever it's pointed out that unions can have downsides.

Unions have upsides, and downsides. Discussing them helps people make good decisions. Pretending it's all flowers and rainbows does not.

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#88
post #55

Can Amazon now just shut down that warehouse and fire all the workers? It would seem like a sensible business move, even if it involves a little bit of service disruption for users in New York.

Are you advocating this course of action?

Is he not allowed to?

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#89
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I very much agree. Every worker should unionize, for the good of us all. Far too much power has been ceded to companies pushing for abusive working practices, that are now largely culturally normalized.

Well, no, I can bargain individually better than a group could try to on my behalf.

So you can singlehandedly get a corporation to improve their working conditions? That's incredible

Re: Amazon workers on Staten Island vote to unionize

#90
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Everyone should have the right to collective bargaining. The US is a closed shop country, which means that, once a union is in place, it has an effective monopoly for the workers that work for one of its companies. If we switched to open shop, then unions would have to compete for membership. Of course, the existing unions are strongly against this. As an end result, everyone I know that's been a union member in the…

The only "workers" who come out ahead in unionized workplaces under current federal labor law are the lawyers.

This is true in so many areas that, by itself, it doesn't really say anything about unions.
Post reply on HN