Live data from Hacker News

Excel 2.0 – Is there a better visual data model than a grid of cells?

subset.so

161–170 of 223 posts

Re: Excel 2.0 – Is there a better visual data model than a grid of cells?

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Excel has been able to name columns for years.

They've always done a horrible job of hiding the dialog for managing named ranges. Easy to create them but knowing where they are is a PITA.

you mean the enormous drop-down on the left at the top? Where it shows the current cell, and you can type to replace the value with a name?

Re: Excel 2.0 – Is there a better visual data model than a grid of cells?

#163
post #153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Airtable really ought to be killing Excel, but the SaaS model combined with a stupidly low artificial row count limit (over 50000 rows is listed as "contact us for pricing") means that it will never achieve penetration into weird and wonderful use cases like Excel has. Like, my default is to throw a dataset I'm hacking on into an SQL database so I can actually query the thing. But no I don't want to upload my 400MB l…

You might want to try out Baserow ( https://baserow.io ). It’s an open source alternative to Airtable, backed by a PostgreSQL database. Main differences are that you can self host it with unlimited rows, it’s modular and it’s made to handle high volumes of data. Disclaimer, I’m the founder of Baserow.

Baserow is frickin awesome and I wish y'all the best.

Re: Excel 2.0 – Is there a better visual data model than a grid of cells?

#164
post #117

My own take on spreadsheets2.0 is https://www.jigdev.com It's mostly inspired from how we use spreadsheets on wall street: a frontend for complex data applications (basically a wysiwyg interface with a DAG repl). Technically, jig is an observable notebook where the cells are spread on a canvas rather than in top/down notebook.

Oh hooray! I'm so glad to see more docs - I will check it out again now.

Re: Excel 2.0 – Is there a better visual data model than a grid of cells?

#165
For a while now I’ve been experimenting with the idea of a strongly typed spreadsheet. There is no grid model; instead computation occurs in discrete cells, where each cell can store one value, with ‘value’ defined as in programming languages to include data structures like lists and tables. Each cell gets its own type, and the formula language is type-checked before running, to allow flexible yet error-checked representation of natural data. Alas, I never was able to find a domain where this tool would be significantly better than both Excel and Jupyter… though somehow I’m still convinced that this would be a useful tool, if only I could find the right place for it.

Re: Excel 2.0 – Is there a better visual data model than a grid of cells?

#166
post #126

I think Eirik Bakke deserves a shoutout on this thread. He's the creator of UltOrg ( https://www.ultorg.com/ ) and has literally spent his career pursuing this question with a level of focus unlike anything I've ever seen. UltOrg is roughly "spreadsheets re-built atop the RDBMS datamodel". The UI supports nested joins, aggregations, filtering, for both display and data update. The result is essentially a general purp…

> UltOrg is roughly "spreadsheets re-built atop the RDBMS datamodel". That's how AirTable is described as well. And Google Tables. And Amazon Honeycode.

Airtable is not really that -- it does not do much/anything in the way of calculations or aggregations. I love it and it's great for creating very structured ways of managing data, but it can't do even very basic aggregations.

Re: Excel 2.0 – Is there a better visual data model than a grid of cells?

#167

I've been thinking about this a ton lately - I think the holy grail is something that extends the spreadsheet UX with the capability to address much larger data sets, roughly equivalent in power to a Jupyter notebook. This probably means constraining some of the totally free-form data entry and imposing some kind of discipline onto columns? As well as some way to intuitively group together groups of cell-level formul…

You know, despite being quite different than what you described, what comes close for me in concept is the Spyder IDE. They have pretty reasonable data visualization tools when you go to inspect variables. I find it really nice work in. It lets me do the real visualization and interplay between variables in code or in my head and just quickly inspect tables/vectors/rasters to sanity check as I work in real time. What…

Despite how many flaws the language itself has, the MATLAB IDE is probably as good at this as Spyder, if not actually better.

Re: Excel 2.0 – Is there a better visual data model than a grid of cells?

#168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They've always done a horrible job of hiding the dialog for managing named ranges. Easy to create them but knowing where they are is a PITA.

you mean the enormous drop-down on the left at the top? Where it shows the current cell, and you can type to replace the value with a name?

There's another dialog to modify, rename, and delete ranges.

Re: Excel 2.0 – Is there a better visual data model than a grid of cells?

#169
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

100% I found what Airtable is doing to be deeply attractive. But their costs and their lock in and their pricing model and it's just... UGH. Microsoft Access was a good idea with a terrible implementation. There HAS to be a unfilled niche here. nocodb looks to be the best answer so far? Because it ties to a backend postgres database, it can be used along side bespoke applications. It still needs development though. I…

Access was pretty incredible for what it is/was. I could build a structured database with a nice UI for non-data people, reports, and even more advanced things like automated emails, exports, etc., in 1/10th or even 1/20th the time it'd take to build something similar as a web app. We had an Access database that managed grant funding for an entire public University and in many ways it worked a lot better than the Saa…

You used to be able to do that with Access 2010 web databases. Of course, Microsoft has deprecated that in favor of Powerapps and Microsoft Dataverse, but it's not clear that actually lets you join an Access database to a low-code frontend. (It should, but there's a lot of marketing speak that I don't quite understand.)

Re: Excel 2.0 – Is there a better visual data model than a grid of cells?

#170
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

100% I found what Airtable is doing to be deeply attractive. But their costs and their lock in and their pricing model and it's just... UGH. Microsoft Access was a good idea with a terrible implementation. There HAS to be a unfilled niche here. nocodb looks to be the best answer so far? Because it ties to a backend postgres database, it can be used along side bespoke applications. It still needs development though. I…

We are trying to answer this with CloudTables ( https://cloudtables.com ) - which is effectively a GUI for my DataTables library with a Postgres backend. Current work is to address the row limit and allow millions of rows without needing to contact "sales" (me), while also not charging per user (I hate that as a customer). If anyone fancies giving it a go and dropping me some feedback that would be most welcome! Ther…

This is off-topic, but I wanted to say a big Thank you for DataTables. I used it on many a project and still rave about how fully functional it is.
Post reply on HN