Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, and most of that similarly doesn't count when it's time for the chips to fall.
I wonder if the same is true for other professions as well? Athletes must have to design their entire lives around a few minutes of competition. Surgeons need to train for years, and all that is evaluated is the patient outcome in the operating room. Lawyers need to train, study, and prepare, and only the court outcome matters. Maybe this is an unfair parallel, but I cannot see why.
Maybe you should do less 'work'
161–170 of 431 posts
Re: Maybe you should do less 'work'
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think for going from junior to senior, this is true, but for going from senior beyond, it’s the opposite.
Lord, not my last boss. Basically was dividing salary by # of Jira tickets to measure productivity even for architects and directors. I got out of their asap.
Re: Maybe you should do less 'work'
#163Just be careful to also invest in things that have a more distant ROI. Family, kids, health, friends, community service, mental health, spirituality - whatever it is that you value.
If you are unfamiliar with what else there is out there that can bring happiness, I'd suggest reading "How will you measure your life?" by Clayton Christensen. He's the same guy that wrote the "Innovators Dilemma".
Re: Maybe you should do less 'work'
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why the difference? Most places that talk about outcomes are really measuring outputs, just with more secret sauce in how it's measured (still based on the perception of the bosses).
Most places that measure outputs are not driving business results, they are measuring the wrong things and even promoting the wrong people. Outputs = Productivity. How much stuff you do. Outcomes = Efficiency. How much useful stuff you do. Don't aim to get more stuff done (productivity), rather aim to have less stuff to do (focus / efficiency). Do more with less. Frequent activity & context switching is hardly tied t…
Re: Maybe you should do less 'work'
#165You are the boss of a company of one. Your company sells labor to the labor market, it makes investments in assets, it borrows funds, etc. It’s your job to decide how that company is run. It’s your job to decide what investments that company needs to make to get good returns. It’s also your job to interpret the contracts your company enters into and decide what is acceptable, and to appropriately risk-manage legal ha…
This makes no sense from my perspective.
I could literally put myself through anything that I needed to, if it meant the safety or well-being of my children. It's not a company, it's a primal force from thousands of years of primordial reinforcement. I'd manage with less capital, so that my kids have a chance at college. I'd manage with less chance of promotion, so that my kids can have my presence at important functions. I'd manage with anything that arose, if it meant something better for them.
I think it's important to understand, and deeply internalize the personal responsibility that adult life brings and the extent to which our decisions influence the things that end up happening, but this analogy of yours borders on psychosis if taken to it's literal end.
A little deeper still, and I think what you're really pointing at is the boundary that decisions can't cross, that certain things are out of our control. Risk management can come into play, but ultimately risk can never be negated. You can only shift it. You can evade the risk of being run over by a bus by never leaving home, but maybe that raises the risk of dying in a house fire, or by being poisoned by lead paint, etc. These aren't "company decisions" they're just a byproduct of life in the natural realm.
I sincerely hope that you don't actually conduct this thinking deep into your lifestyle, perceiving things as though one big company spreadsheet of assets and liabilities.
Much love, friend.
Re: Maybe you should do less 'work'
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you are pretty good at your work that minimum might only take 20 hours?
Well i'm not talking hours, to be clear. Just some idea that we're all equal. Ie, if a hypothetical society depends on addicts working more than "lazy people" (in the parents words) then it feels to me we're set up for failure.
Re: Maybe you should do less 'work'
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
> When truly internalise that fact is when you become an adult. Implying that everyone who runs a company is mature and makes responsible decisions, which is not true.
Not all companies survive. Some companies, like people survive despite odd choices due to corruption, etc.
Re: Maybe you should do less 'work'
#168I agree with the content of the article, but I don’t agree with the premise that these things aren’t also “work”. Engineers tend to obsess over, “focused work” like it’s the only way to be productive, and anything that’s not “focused work” is wasted time. That is a surefire way to burn out. Instead, finding ways to “riff” on your job by doing work with longer time horizons of payoff keeps your job fun. It’s all “work…
> That is a surefire way to burn out. Any source on that? I agree with the assessment about engineers (althought it's a generalization), but I always thought it was because their "focused work" is what they actually like doing. In my experience work was most stressful when it strayed the most from focused work.
Generally, slapping "Source?" in a reply to a comment is a lot less helpful and productive than you might initially think.
Re: Maybe you should do less 'work'
#169Beyond those arguments, it's also important to remind that we should work between 20 or 30 hours per week, not more. It's about health, being able to rest, do leisure, physical activity, see friends, date, etc. There are things to learn about the antiwork mentality. Not saying everyone should quit their job, but still, it would be nice if everyone could be able to negotiate with their employees. I have often been cal…
Re: Maybe you should do less 'work'
#170Can confirm this will not get you promoted, it will just get you more work. You are more valuable as a peon than management if you are this good at your job. Always act dumber than your boss.