Live data from Hacker News

In Praise of Bad Steve

theatlantic.com

41–50 of 86 posts

Re: In Praise of Bad Steve

#41

I've never worked for Apple and never really aspired to, mostly because my interests didn't overlap with what I thought I would probably be doing there, but partly, I have to admit, because I had heard the stories of Steve the tyrant and was put off by them. Maybe my ego is sturdier now, because I wonder if I wouldn't have enjoyed the challenges he set people. One thing is for sure, you could know that if you did wha…

I've worked briefly at Apple, but had only one face-to-face encounter with Steve. It was intensely scary. He was loved -- LOVED -- on the Apple campus. But he was also feared. And I felt that fear when I saw him. He was, and remains, the only person I've been genuinely "star struck" upon encountering. A lot of that was born of admiration, but just as much was born of terror. In retrospect, I realized that I wasn't re…

[deleted]

Re: In Praise of Bad Steve

#42
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's more than the just the Apple II and the iPhone. The way I see it, the man's main hobby was disruption. He disrupted the PC industry with the Apple II and later the Mac line. He disrupted the music industry with the iPod and iTunes, and the phone industry with the iPhone. He changed the animation industry with Pixar one of the most successful, both financially, and critically acclaimed movie company. He r…

I don't think you know what disruption is. The PC industry is working just fine, and a Mac and PC are more similar than they are different. The music industry has hardly changed due to the iPod, you sell one way you sell another - that's not disruption. And the phone industry most certainly did not change, it's just an incremental improvement on the fancy phones that have been getting steadily better. The iPhone may…

Partly what you say is true.

But I'd say iTunes (music store) was disruptive. It changed how the music industry operated.

The iphone changed how we 'use' phones more than it changed the 'phone industry'. In fact, on writing that, I think that captures what Apple does best, it 'disrupts' how people perceive and use a product, that may in-turn distrupt an industry, but that is a consequence, not the goal (for Apple).

Re: In Praise of Bad Steve

#43

"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." Bernard Shaw

I would like that quote more if it read

> Therefore all innovation

because I think progress can still happen in a world that does not adapt to change, but innovation cannot.

Re: In Praise of Bad Steve

#45
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think that's really justified. Jobs had a long career, and only two real industry-dominating hits: the Apple II (most of which was Woz's work) and the iPhone. A lot of the hyperbole we're seeing right now is because Jobs had the mis/fortune to die at the very peak of his hit. Had we all been doing the same analysis in the mid-90's when NeXT was failing and Pixar a mostly academic curiosity, I doubt anyone wou…

We could argue about the domination of the Mac or the impact and legacy of NeXT and Pixar, but... You really don't think the iPod was an industry-dominating hit? They sold hundreds of millions of them, and no other company ever really came up with a successful answer to them. It was left to Apple itself to kill them with the iPhone.

The ipod was around for three years before it took off in sales, and there were plenty of other music players available at the time that were more popular and had better functionality. Most of the iPod's initial success wasn't because of anything innovative about the product, but because of very, very savvy marketing.

It's very interesting to watch all this historical revisionism that paints Jobs as the mysterious shadowy figure that was the creator of the digital portable music device, which was a boom product from day 1. Don't forget, Apple has also had several flops over the past decade, but no-one remembers them because of selective bias.

Jobs was an incredible man, but let's see him for what he did; don't turn him into a myth.

Re: In Praise of Bad Steve

#47
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I always thought that was a terrible argument. So they weren't slaves like blacks in the US south, but they could have still been slaves. Slaves can have skill, families and pride in their work. Historically some slaves were trusted to go out on their own and do business for their owner, and not run away! Some slaves became so important to their master than they actually inherited the estate when the master died. So…

"So they weren't slaves like blacks in the US south, but they could have still been slaves." Relationships are complicated, maybe its best not to put labels on things. In all seriousness though, regardless of what their specific status was, most societies where people are building things like pyramids tend to be pretty messed up.

A slave is someone who does not have permission to chose his own work, and does not have permission to (or is prevented from) quiting. (Note that I said permission, not ability.)

A slave can still be paid.

Based on my definition of slave I believe the pyramids were built by slaves.

Re: In Praise of Bad Steve

#48
post #16
post #2

The talk about "Bad Steve" reminds me about Gundotra telling the "Icon Ambulance" story the day that Steve stepped down, in which Steve calls him up on a Sunday because "we have an urgent issue" involving the color gradient on the Google iphone icon. https://plus.google.com/107117483540235115863/posts/gcSStkKx... For many people, that kind of anal attention to detail (and describing it as an "urgent" matter) would be…

I don't think that's really justified. Jobs had a long career, and only two real industry-dominating hits: the Apple II (most of which was Woz's work) and the iPhone. A lot of the hyperbole we're seeing right now is because Jobs had the mis/fortune to die at the very peak of his hit. Had we all been doing the same analysis in the mid-90's when NeXT was failing and Pixar a mostly academic curiosity, I doubt anyone wou…

The iPhone wouldn't be what it is without OS X.

There's another thing.

Re: In Praise of Bad Steve

#49
post #13

There is no doubt he left his mark on the world. However, I'd bet that > 90% of people who are praising him now would never have enjoyed working for him in any capacity.

I'll bet some of the people who willingly did so for years didn't really like "working for Steve". If you get enough satisfaction out of the results, though, that doesn't really matter as much. People sometimes stay in otherwise intolerably boring jobs for years because they really like their bosses and/or coworkers, and sometimes they stay in incredibly exciting and fulfilling jobs for years despite loathing same.

I've worked with dictators (kitchen chefs in very high end restaurants) since I was 13.. First I hated it then it got to me.. If you're truly passionate about something, and its your life mission, not much else matters.

http://www.sagmeister.com/work/all#/node/207

Re: In Praise of Bad Steve

#50
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think that's really justified. Jobs had a long career, and only two real industry-dominating hits: the Apple II (most of which was Woz's work) and the iPhone. A lot of the hyperbole we're seeing right now is because Jobs had the mis/fortune to die at the very peak of his hit. Had we all been doing the same analysis in the mid-90's when NeXT was failing and Pixar a mostly academic curiosity, I doubt anyone wou…

Wouldn't Pixar count as "industry-dominating"? It may be too early to tell, but I'd bet money the iPad will also end up in that category. The man took a company that was going out of business and turned it into the largest company in the world. I don't think this talk is "hyperbole" in the least. http://www.google.com//finance?chdnp=1&chdd=1&chds=1...

Pixar is beyond "industry-dominating". They basically invented the (CG film) industry. When Steve first acquired Pixar he was losing $1 million/year. It takes a true visionary to realize the potential in an idea and work through what to most would seem like an insurmountable challenge.
Post reply on HN