Live data from Hacker News

ReVanced

github.com

191–200 of 248 posts

Re: ReVanced

#191
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly. So I’m paying 12$ a month, which is more than Netflix and still get ads. That’s actually the reason why I won’t get YT premium.

Why not just stop watching people who do that if you don’t like it?

Because we don't have to. We have technology that fixes the problem: sponsor block and ublock origin.

Re: ReVanced

#192

I have a feeling that any piece of closed-source software that becomes important enough will inevitably be reverse engineered by highly motivated people. This is doubly so for Vanced: The original team took pains to not release the source, but it merely took a few weeks for someone else to reverse engineer the reverse engineered codebase. I've worked on preserving a few games with decompilers long after the original…

No post body was provided.

Re: ReVanced

#193
post #7

Youtube's frequency of ads has become so extreme that I've just yesterday opted to pay 11€/month for YT Premium. I had tried before disabling them with a Pihole or by blocking domains. It didn't work. Also, on a Samsung TV, you can't really install another front end.

You do realize that you are paying more than 11/month right? Google is also stealing your data. I don't know how you value yours, but mine is priceless.

Re: ReVanced

#194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's because modern advertising's purpose isn't to tell people about a product they already wanted but didn't know existed (which would be fine), it's to cause people to feel a sense of fear/loss/inadequacy that they previously didn't and then present the product as a solution, or associate a product with something people love in a manipulative way, because those types of ads are worlds more effective at driving sale…

> modern advertising's purpose isn't to tell people about a product they already wanted but didn't know existed Yes. > it's to cause people to feel a sense of fear/loss/inadequacy that they previously didn't and then present the product as a solution Maybe a bit. But, these days I think the real reason is the corrupctive influence ad money buys. Major media platforms censor at the whim of their advertisers. Content p…

Completely agree. I've seen websites delete whole pages and heavily censor remaining ones because somebody complained to Google that their sensibilities were offended. Advertisers should not have this power.

Re: ReVanced

#195
post #167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not "a few bucks", it's like $12 a month, more than most streaming services, for the privilege of having it not pause the video when you lock the phone. Which it shouldn't be doing in the first place. Also this yet one more thing on top of the subscriptions you already have. Can't subscribe to all of them.

There are more features than that. You get music streaming ( usually in the $£$ 10 range), no ads and offline downloads. It's really not a bad deal, especially shared on the family plan.

Losing ads, sure, and it would be good to pay them something, but IDGAF about YouTube Music (I have Spotify for that) or their watered-down download function (which I'm pretty sure is locked to playing the download in their app). So the 50 SEK (5.32 USD) difference between Premium Lite and Premium would be purely to make it not pause.

Re: ReVanced

#196
post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure it's worth the $20 per month for a family plan of up to five either.

$4/person for music streaming, and all the video on the internet, without ads? What is a fair price for you?

And if you don't care about their music service?

Re: ReVanced

#197
post #129

side note, on iOS, I uninstalled youtube app and use the site in safari with an ad blocker.

Check out Vinegar ( https://apps.apple.com/us/app/vinegar-tube-cleaner/id1591303 ...) It is so good I am almost afraid to mention it and it get too popular. No affiliation at all with the product, just a happy user. (edited to remove incorrect statement)

App is not available in my country (us) :(

Re: ReVanced

#198
post #69

It always suprises me how unwilling the tech community is to support creators on YouTube. You're not hurting YouTube by blocking ads, you're hurting the people who get ads from their videos. Just pay for Youtube Premium - its no different than Spotify or Apple music price-wise and people shell out for that without thinking every month.

No. If your business model is ads, I won't support you. I'll find a way to block your ads and I'll tell everyone who will listen how to do the same. I don't appreciate being brainwashed just so creators can get paid.

How would be your business model without ads if you owned YouTube then?

As a video platform owner, you should pay creators, you should pay for all the server costs which is capable of 4k+ streaming, besides you serve all the music and pay royalties.

Re: ReVanced

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe you didn't know this, but Google is stingy as fuck in terms of the portion of ad revenue they share with content creators. Most content creators just see youtube as a way to get exposure, then they turn around and monetize other ways like sponsors, patreon, product sales, etc.

Do you have an actual source? Some numbers? Because 1k views=$1 is pretty good for a clips channel[0], and YT Premium views have always payed more than ad-supported views[1,2]. It's generally not sustainable to only rely on Adsense but it's a piece of the pie that most creators couldn't make up for overnight if it disappeared. 0: https://youtu.be/aaoVlFVqYuk?t=20 1: https://www.dailydot.com/upstream/totalbiscuit-yout…

I’ve also read an article that google pays 68% of ad revenue to creators if I’m not mistaken.
Post reply on HN