Some notes for the non-economically schooled readers: - Ungated (working paper) versions are here[1] and here[2] - This was published in Econometrica, one of the top journals in economics. That doesn't mean that the results are true, but it means that the the math and methodology are probably sound. If you want to attack the results, the weaknesses are probably in the (implicit) model assumptions. - In economic lingo…
Isn't the conclusion trivial? With perfect price discrimination, every buyer exposes their exact utility gain from buying the product, that's the price they'll pay for it. Of course the resource will be allocated optimally. Naturally in this situation only the seller will benefit from the transaction. Everyone else is +-0. Utility/"welfare" is maximized but consumers get none of it. And of course, in the end even tal…
I do agree that it's unremarkable that price discrimination results in higher total welfare than uniform prices though, and all the other conclusions are completely in line with expectations. Its also the case that the airline's own price discrimination models will be more sophisticated with access to better (commercially sensitive) data than this stylised version