Live data from Hacker News

Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”

news.ycombinator.com

281–290 of 348 posts

Re: Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”

#281
This won't help. Companies will just make you wait 3 hours on the line before talking to a human, and then the human you get won't speak your language. I suggest the often-underestimated art of "voting with your wallet"* and using a different service.

* - Or in today's online ad-funded world, "voting with your eyeballs"

Re: Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”

#282
It shouldn't have to be this way but you can get pretty far using consumer advocacy hacks. Find out the CEO/board member/VP of customer service's name through the company page/linkedin and from there it's usually easy to guess an email address. I've been able to get an actual human to call me from companies that you wouldn't associate with this like Ebay, Google, and Mint.com/inuit. I've used it also with my insurance company and that awful shipping company that NewEgg uses when a laptop was stolen. I was able to talk to humans there but it didn't come to anything. I've also used it with bank issues, you can Google executive customer service plus your bank. The service was like night and day after this method.

There can be discomfort in doing this because it feels intrusive but companies do deserve it if they don't offer consumers rights like this. Once you get past the discomfort it's so empowering. If you're with someone unhelpful on the phone you can ALWAYS hang up. That includes 911. You can set a limit for yourself, that you'll try the "normal" customer service route 1-2 times before escalating it but if you reach that wall with what the company is giving you do not feel bad for using the consumer advocacy strategies.

Re: Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”

#283
They are way, way ahead of you. Just in the recent months I've encountered the following models:

1. You can speak to a real person, but you'd need to navigate a phone tree in an exactly right way, many levels deep, and any wrong step would lead you to an automatic answer and disconnect. The exact options you need to press change frequently and are only partially supported by the voice prompts.

2. There's an option to speak to a person, but the call mysteriously drops each time you try to use it. Of course, to report the problem, you'd need to speak to some person there... you see how it works?

3. There's an option to speak to a person, but every time you try, they are on a meeting, or speaking to somebody else, or temporarily left their office, so you can leave the message. If you guessed you'd never get a followup, you're a smart person.

4. You can speak to a real person, but unfortunately not today, because we have exceptionally high call volume today. Try maybe tomorrow. Got this one from the IRS, for example. Guess what happens tomorrow.

5. You can speak to a real person. No, really. No kidding. Unfortunately, this person has no access to anything but filling up a request form that is filed into the internal tracking system. You do not have access to this system, and neither does the real person you're speaking to, except for filing requests. You don't know who, if ever, will be handling the problem, when it happens - the real person helpfully assures you it'll happen as soon as possible - and there would be no status update or feedback whatsoever.

6. You can speak to a real person, but this person is given a script - having things akin to "are you sure you computer is turned on?", "please restart your computer and see if it happens again", etc. - and will not deviate from it, and beyond that you're confidently told the problem is surely elsewhere and there's no way they can help you. There's no non-scripted persons to talk to.

7. You can speak to a real person, but your issue appears to be a bit complicated, so the real person will have to consult with the other people in the office and give you a call back tomorrow with the resolution. The call never happens. Next time you call you speak to a different person, which has no idea what happened before, so you have to repeat everything from scratch. There's no way to speak to a person you spoke before. Guess the outcome.

If you want to be cruel, add to it poor line quality (I don't know how they achieve it, but I've never had worse call quality than on support calls), random call drops and support personnel with marginal command of spoken English. But that's just an icing on top.

Re: Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”

#284
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The worst is when they won't accept new calls in queue, and just hang up.

Aflac has recently (past year) 100% stopped their phone support. Calling their phone support tells you to log in to their website. I hope you don't have trouble with their website! I was able to get my issue sort-of resolved by making a complaint to a regulator -- I now have a direct line to someone capable of taking my phone call. But that's not an option for every company.

Same here, also with Aflac - had lots of emails, and actually managed to even speak to someone on the phone, with no use. Had to file complaints to every place I could find to complain for them to fix the issue - which was a totally trivial issue like they have requirement to have form called "Foo Bar" and the form my provider produces is called "Foo Baz" and it's obviously the same thing but since it doesn't have the same words they expect nobody dares to make that determination. Took me several months to get through it. Can't see any ads from Aflac that advertise instant cash payoffs without laughing bitterly.

Re: Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”

#285
post #136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Aflac has recently (past year) 100% stopped their phone support. Calling their phone support tells you to log in to their website. I hope you don't have trouble with their website! I was able to get my issue sort-of resolved by making a complaint to a regulator -- I now have a direct line to someone capable of taking my phone call. But that's not an option for every company.

The IRS dumps you after navigating their call tree if you need less popular options that aren't clear. Me: I want to comply with tax laws but have a question. IRS: Oh, you submitted paperwork and want to follow up on a letter we responded with? Hey, good luck. Maybe get an opinion from a tax attorney or CPA on what we mean in our comms.

Got this from IRS recently. "We're not giving you $FIVE_FIGURE_SUM of your return because we won't tell you why, if you want details, call our number". Calling their number says "we have too many shmucks to call us already, you're out of luck, bye-bye". I foresee it's going to be very, very frustrating experience.

Re: Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”

#286

I recently had the experience of trying to do a banking operation that required an in-person visit. For some reason this bank required me to do this operation at the branch that I originally opened the account, which is not where I live anymore, and it's very inconvenient for me to go there. So, while I was in another city of that country, I decided to try and handle that problem. I went to a branch and asked them to…

This. Humans aren't a panacea for getting problems solved. I would much rather open a ticket than wait on hold for hours to speak with a human in a call center in a low wage country half way around the world, with whom I can't easily communicate either because they have a limited mastery of English, or just because we speak very different dialects with very different accents and have limited shared cultural context w…

Also, we're more and more moving to the situation where the humans might as well be computers. 1. They don't have the training or judgment to think about your problem and route you in the right direction and/or 2. They are disallowed from doing anything besides what the computer tells them they can do. So you tell them what you want, and if it doesn't fall neatly into one of the enumerated buckets of Things They Can Do, you're out of luck. Reminds me of the Hospital Customer Support scene [1] from Idiocracy.

1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXzJR7K0wK0

Re: Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”

#287

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The sheer cardinality of ways they mess it up is impressive. 1. Long intro message with hours, location, website intro, email address and to hang up and call 911 if it’s an emergency 2. “Our menu items have recently changed” years after changing them 3. “We are currently experiencing higher than normal call volume” 100% of the time 4. No “other” option 5. Listing options 2, 3, 4, 5 and then the most common option “1,…

"Our call volume is currently very high and the wait time is X minutes. Please press 1 if you would like to be put in the queue and have an agent call you." I wish more companies did this so that I can actually get on with my day without spending it on hold.

Except they either won't call back at all, or will call back way later than promised - usually when you decided it's not going to happen and moved on with your day, and now you don't have any of the documents and data you need with you and actually are driving, so the callback is useless.

Re: Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”

#288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Haven’t you tried calling the DMV before? It’s a nightmare. Governments are not significantly better at this than private industry. Private industry can be great at it, they just have no incentive to be currently.

Here in Maine, the DMV is super easy to deal with, and very reliable. In fact, my girlfriend's state job involves working with people over the phone to fix problems and help them get what they need, and she's great at it. A reminder about state governments; You get exactly what you vote for, and no more.

My current one is fine too. That doesn't mean the DMV in general, for most Americans, doesn't suck. There's some amount of randomness to it, especially the population/density of the area, so I would argue it's not exactly what you vote for, it's also random.

Re: Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”

#289
post #268

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The problem is, not every business you need to contact is something you are doing business with. For example, a business that has unwittingly published your contact information. Or, alternatively, Equifax, a data broker that makes plenty of money and controls your destiny to some extent yet which you do not pay directly. Besides, there is no way to know in advance that you will have a problem that requires a phone ca…

> not every business you need to contact is something you are doing business with While this is true, it's not an argument for a blanket regulation that requires all businesses to provide human phone support. The cases you describe (a business unwittingly publishes contact information that you have kept private, or a credit reporting agency that has incorrect information about you) are specific types of situations wi…

Yes, and it's quite obvious that businesses are rife with negative consequences, especially in the way they create externalities.

> we all need to be prepared to accept tradeoffs

Do we "need" to be? This is why we have laws. We don't "need" to accept that murder will happen, for example. We can legislate that no, you can't just kill someone because you feel like it. Similarly no, you can't just not answer the phone because you just don't feel like it.

Re: Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”

#290

This would not help, since humans are trained to respond like robots. They vaguely understand your support request and then copy-paste a knowledge base support blog post at you. Even by phone, they do this exact same thing. At least my bank does, until you get escalated to a supervisor, who is permitted to go off-script for a minute. You explain you've read the support info and it doesn't apply to your case, at which…

The worst here is that there is no single person on this Earth - except you - that cares about this outcome and would do something to fix it. Support does not care - their job is to copy-paste answers from script. Finance does not care - they have millions of clients, it's much easier to let one go than to start making exceptions. Software devs don't care - they have hundreds of bugs, what's one more? They are paid the same anyway. It's big enough that the value of single subscriber - even with the most expensive plan - is indistinguishable from zero. So you get your worth of service - zero.
Post reply on HN