I agree that companies have a responsibility to listen to and address customer complaints. The problem is that a small percentage of customers create the bulk of the customer support burden. With phone support this gets even more skewed. You can't have engineers do phone support or they won't be able to get any real work done with all the interruptions. You can have engineers investigate and address all complaints th…
Let alone customers who abuse support staff: cursing them out, treating them like idiots, being racist, etc
Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”
161–170 of 348 posts
Re: Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”
#162Ultimately, the OP or my non-tech savvy employee or my mother should be able to get real answers and/or help from a human being when wronged by Google, a telco, or the local bank.
Re: Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
The sheer cardinality of ways they mess it up is impressive. 1. Long intro message with hours, location, website intro, email address and to hang up and call 911 if it’s an emergency 2. “Our menu items have recently changed” years after changing them 3. “We are currently experiencing higher than normal call volume” 100% of the time 4. No “other” option 5. Listing options 2, 3, 4, 5 and then the most common option “1,…
I think of this sometimes like a roller coaster park where you pay a flat rate to get in and then ride as much as you want all day. The ideal scenario for the visitor is to go in and ride continuously, not waiting for anything. However, the ideal scenario for the park is for you to spend your whole day in queues, not taking up space on the rides, and not running around making the park feel "crowded". The equilibrium…
Even in the long term, this might look like a good thing to a CEO. However, my point is that it isn’t.
Re: Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”
#164If you want to talk to a human, file a claim in small claims court. If your problem is not big enough to file, stop using the service and look for a company that will support your needs. Don't make me pay for your poor choice.
Re: Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the point here is that it’s a bad business model. I don’t mean “bad as in won’t make you money or keep the business running,” I mean “bad for society.” Hence the desire to regulate.
Regulation doesn’t make unprofitable businesses exist. If the business model is unviable with support those businesses will simply not exist or cost an amount of money that is unappealing.
Re: Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
I bet 99.99% of people who complain about not having a human to talk don't want to pay a single dollar for that human.
Supporting evidence: you could hire a virtual (human) assistant to drive the ticket email process forward for you. "Nobody" does.
Re: Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you elaborate on that? How would it be different in a non-free speech country? Is there a country I can go to make someone legally disappear due to an online review they posted, I have a list. Let me know
We aren’t talking about law, we are talking about spirit. It’s perfectly legal for you to ask Google to take it down and for them to take it down. The point is, that goes against the spirit of this culture, which is that you really can’t and shouldn’t silence someone in general. Again, I ask, are they lying or do they have accurate points? This is best taken as a learning experience because treating it as a battle is…
ah damn, one of the the philosophical free speech people that made up a standard the spot, I wrote in a related comment:
> its hard to tell which people just completely misunderstand the first amendment, and which people are talking about a "philosophical" free speech that they made up on the spot to bolster their point
so, what does that have to do with any particular country? what countries is it different? what is particular about the country you speak of?
Re: Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”
#168If they found anti-user practice they have sanctioning power in the order of % of revenues, little the first time, hard the second, claiming personal executives responsibility a third breach. They not only check products but also services, software and hybrid stuff.
Selling crap is subject to little sanctions, like if you sell thing that are clearly designed to break in very little time, you sell things to elicit more money forcing mandatory services etc you'll pay so much that's simply illogical trying to.
Imposing just a phone number and a reachable human on the company side I fear is far from sufficient: these days is common arrive to a humans, but a powerless one, who can just open or "bump" a ticket. Again simple laws who take into account only one side fail for easy corruption, that's why a public and transparent, forced to be independent and only able to operate to a certain extent actor is needed. Most people is honest in a society because that's the best evolution behavior but most if far from all, so rules must be crafted on humans defects making bad behaviors disadvantageous from all side possible. It's hard, of course, but not impossible, and a real Democracy can control and block dangerous derives quick enough.
Re: Tell HN: There needs to be a “right to speak with a human”
#169You don't have the right to tell others how to run their business. You do have the right to take your business elsewhere. In a free market people vote with their wallet and there's plenty out there that accept the zero support model with a lower price, whether they understand what they are getting or not. That's assuming they even bother to ask about support options up front.
you have a right to free speech, but that doesn't mean others are obligated to provide you an audience