I hope this works for them, but it seems a little bit contrived to me. If they just took a fundraising approach like how public radio and Wikipedia do, I would gladly contribute a few times per year when a big banner shows up asking for donations. That would be a nice direct value proposition -- "please contribute so we can keep this awesome resource free and high quality" But paying for customizations? This seems li…
> If they just took a fundraising approach like how public radio and Wikipedia do People notoriously _hate_ both these group's approach to funding.
Mozilla and Open Web Docs Working Together on MDN
71–80 of 103 posts
Re: Mozilla and Open Web Docs Working Together on MDN
#72I hope this works for them, but it seems a little bit contrived to me. If they just took a fundraising approach like how public radio and Wikipedia do, I would gladly contribute a few times per year when a big banner shows up asking for donations. That would be a nice direct value proposition -- "please contribute so we can keep this awesome resource free and high quality" But paying for customizations? This seems li…
> If they just took a fundraising approach like how public radio and Wikipedia do People notoriously _hate_ both these group's approach to funding.
MDN has a smaller set of users, and the thing with running websites with user-generated content is that it scales up pretty well. MDN probably only costs about a tenth as much as Wikipedia to run, but has much, must less than a tenth as many users.
Re: Mozilla and Open Web Docs Working Together on MDN
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mozilla management is so expensive to maintain.
Mozilla management is probably around 1% of the budget, more if you count middle management but I doubt you're discussing positions like those.
This person alone receives around 1% of the budget.
Re: Mozilla and Open Web Docs Working Together on MDN
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
Of course. Mozilla is competing for the same talent as Google, Microsoft, and Apple. Browsers are the most important software at those companies because most other software runs on them. The Hacker News community doesn’t seem to appreciate the work Mozilla has done to establish web standards. I’ve experienced what it’s like to be stuck with IE6 and IE11 for a decade, holding back web projects at work. Firefox broke t…
"Mozilla is competing for the same talent as Google, Microsoft, and Apple." Not exactly the same. Many are willing to accept less pay, to work on meaningful open source and not for advertisement.
Edit: I think we may be starting to figure this out. Google is slowly starting to charge for more services. Even Facebook is looking to introduce paid products (Quest). People are also learning from Elon Musk how much wealth can be generated by working on major human problems like transport, energy, and space access.
Re: Mozilla and Open Web Docs Working Together on MDN
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
There isn't even a way to donate. All "mozilla" donations go to the foundation and their social justice causes, not useful things like MSN and Firefox.
That's because donations will never even remotely cover Mozilla's costs. They get something like $3m in donations. Wikipedia gets something like $120m. Mozilla's costs and Google income are like $400m.
Wikimedia Foundation had a revenue of $157 million in 2021 and >550 staff and contractors.
Re: Mozilla and Open Web Docs Working Together on MDN
#76Death to w3schools! When search engines allowed blacklisting domain, w3schools was my first and only pick. It always seems to show up on top for many web tech questions, but the quality is rubbish. MDN is a breath of fresh air in this regard. I expect it will knock w3schools of it's search result throne in the coming years. The end of a era of low quality, ad sponsored (4 ads, just counted) web technology reference.
Re: Mozilla and Open Web Docs Working Together on MDN
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
There isn't even a way to donate. All "mozilla" donations go to the foundation and their social justice causes, not useful things like MSN and Firefox.
You can contribute directly to Thunderbird, I often wonder if it's poor performance is one of the reasons similar things aren't tried with Firefox. https://give.thunderbird.net/en-US/
But even apart from Mozilla's lack of involvement, it's also a wildly different - and so incomparable - product (local email in a webmail dominated world, compared to a browser in a browser dominated world).
Thunderbird would absolutely be worse off if they didn't have that (great, well organised) facility.
Re: Mozilla and Open Web Docs Working Together on MDN
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mozilla management is probably around 1% of the budget, more if you count middle management but I doubt you're discussing positions like those.
"Mozilla CEO Increased Her Salary From 2.5 Million Dollars to Over 3 Million" This person alone receives around 1% of the budget.
Re: Mozilla and Open Web Docs Working Together on MDN
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
> If they just took a fundraising approach like how public radio and Wikipedia do People notoriously _hate_ both these group's approach to funding.
Public Radio wouldn't bother me so much if they didn't also constantly run ads.
Re: Mozilla and Open Web Docs Working Together on MDN
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
As someone who's done webdev for a living since 1998, I share the OP's distaste for w3schools -- they truly earned their notoriety as a low-quality, spammy, SEO-hacking parasite. It was so bad it inspired a large group of some of the biggest names in the field to push back with a site called "w3fools" that tried to set the record straight and steer the hapless masses away from w3schools. See eg https://web.archive.or…
> Unfortunately, it seems w3schools has since managed to acquire the w3fools domain "Seems"? Do you know that it is true, or are you guessing?