Live data from Hacker News

Court affirms imported beef still allowed to be labeled "Product of USA"

foodsafetynews.com

1–10 of 146 posts

Re: Court affirms imported beef still allowed to be labeled "Product of USA"

#3
Lobbying at its finest – an open form of corruption. The system needs an institution controlling these "interest groups". A force that can weigh the millions of dollars they spend to sway decision makers' opinions against "the greater good" (which often turns out to be public health).

The same goes for the unneccessarily prolonged fight against tobacco companies and junk food in schools.

Re: Court affirms imported beef still allowed to be labeled "Product of USA"

#5
post #3

Lobbying at its finest – an open form of corruption. The system needs an institution controlling these "interest groups". A force that can weigh the millions of dollars they spend to sway decision makers' opinions against "the greater good" (which often turns out to be public health). The same goes for the unneccessarily prolonged fight against tobacco companies and junk food in schools.

Calling food that is 90%+ made in another country a "Product of the USA" is just insulting and I think if there was no money involved in the judges' decision making they'd just call this what it is; deceptive trade practices.

Re: Court affirms imported beef still allowed to be labeled "Product of USA"

#8
The actual ruling is here:

https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/0101...

The dissent starts on page 22 of that PDF, it's an interesting read.

"The text, history, and purpose of the FMIA all point toward the same conclusion: Congress could not have intended to authorize outright deception in meat labeling. Plaintiffs invoke state law to challenge precisely this sort of label, alleging that defendants mislead consumers about the origin of their beef products."

Re: Court affirms imported beef still allowed to be labeled "Product of USA"

#9
In the US, Tic-Tac has zero calories. The same Tic-Tac is advertised in the EU as having "2 calories".

If a pack full of candy, 0.5g (edit) sugar each, can be sold as zero-kcal candy, then what's the fuss with meat labelling? Not lobbied enough?

Post reply on HN