Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh no! Boomers will lose 401(k) value! The horror!
Phrased less sarcastically: "Millions of retirees won't have enough money to survive until they pass away."
Can you have it both ways ?
101–110 of 693 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Yes, the only way raising these rates could reduce demand is by increasing unemployment. It could also reduce demand by making it more expensive to buy things. Sure, that will probably have a side-effect of increasing unemployment, but that unemployment isn't the goal. The goal is to make it cost more to do things so less people want to do them.
I wonder why we'd want to pull levers to make things cost more, when the goal is to fight inflation, the bad phenomenon in which things cost more.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s even worse - if the Fed actions tank the markets, then millions of retirees who have been enjoying high market values are screwed and have no other source of wealth or income. I do not envy the position the Fed is in.
Won't somebody please think of the poor poor boomers with millions of equity in their houses! Cry me a river.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s even worse - if the Fed actions tank the markets, then millions of retirees who have been enjoying high market values are screwed and have no other source of wealth or income. I do not envy the position the Fed is in.
It's rough. On the one hand, retirees bring nothing of real value to the economy. We serve them because of the obligations they built up over their working careers. But, they get the focus of attention because a) they have all the money, b) they have all the time to be engaged in politics, and c) they vote. But they're purely an extractive cost center. A kind of economic parasite that keeps getting bigger and bigger…
For a lot of people, what is even the point of living if there's no retirement to enjoy?
They are an extractive class insofar as their present contributions are net negative. But you are forgetting they likely spent their entire life building up that account, both in terms of an actual retirement and the broader accounting of total life's contributions. Indeed, it is something that hopefully you and I will enjoy one day, because we've earned it.
That idea reeks of short-term thinking, and a world of endless work for no reward as your worth goes to 0 once you stop contributing.
The Fed is trapped: It can’t raise too much since trillions of debt rely on very low rates. If it doesn’t raise enough then inflation will cause a recession.
It’s even worse - if the Fed actions tank the markets, then millions of retirees who have been enjoying high market values are screwed and have no other source of wealth or income. I do not envy the position the Fed is in.
As long as your stock assets aren’t touched for 3-5 years it doesn’t matter what the market does in the next few months.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s even worse - if the Fed actions tank the markets, then millions of retirees who have been enjoying high market values are screwed and have no other source of wealth or income. I do not envy the position the Fed is in.
It's rough. On the one hand, retirees bring nothing of real value to the economy. We serve them because of the obligations they built up over their working careers. But, they get the focus of attention because a) they have all the money, b) they have all the time to be engaged in politics, and c) they vote. But they're purely an extractive cost center. A kind of economic parasite that keeps getting bigger and bigger…
Let's not forget that consumption is bringing in revenue to _someone_ which does provide value to the economy. Unbelievable
The Fed is trapped: It can’t raise too much since trillions of debt rely on very low rates. If it doesn’t raise enough then inflation will cause a recession.
It’s even worse - if the Fed actions tank the markets, then millions of retirees who have been enjoying high market values are screwed and have no other source of wealth or income. I do not envy the position the Fed is in.
The Fed is trapped: It can’t raise too much since trillions of debt rely on very low rates. If it doesn’t raise enough then inflation will cause a recession.
It’s even worse - if the Fed actions tank the markets, then millions of retirees who have been enjoying high market values are screwed and have no other source of wealth or income. I do not envy the position the Fed is in.
[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/17/heres-where-most-americans-a...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s even worse - if the Fed actions tank the markets, then millions of retirees who have been enjoying high market values are screwed and have no other source of wealth or income. I do not envy the position the Fed is in.
It's rough. On the one hand, retirees bring nothing of real value to the economy. We serve them because of the obligations they built up over their working careers. But, they get the focus of attention because a) they have all the money, b) they have all the time to be engaged in politics, and c) they vote. But they're purely an extractive cost center. A kind of economic parasite that keeps getting bigger and bigger…
[1] other working people once they too retire.