Live data from Hacker News

US Senate votes unanimously to make daylight savings time permanent

twitter.com

201–210 of 1001 posts

Re: US Senate votes unanimously to make daylight savings time permanent

#201
This is nice to see. A provincial referendum to make DST permanent failed in Alberta last year (49.9% in favour to 50.1% against).

I have no strong opinions on whether we should make it permanent daylight saving time or standard time. To me, the important thing is just picking one and sticking with it.

Re: US Senate votes unanimously to make daylight savings time permanent

#202

Such a terrible idea compared to permanent standard time. There is plenty of light during the summer, so there's no need to optimize for that. The winter is when daylight is scarce, so that's what should be optimized for.

When it’s scarce you want to waste it on the early morning?

During the winter in the northern latitudes it's not so early.

Re: US Senate votes unanimously to make daylight savings time permanent

#203

Can someone explain why they actually care about this? I always see such strong opinions on it but really, why does it matter to you? Most clocks are digital and change automatically these days and otherwise changing your clocks twice a year is such a minor inconvenience. And whether or not the light should be preferred in the morning or vending is probably a pretty even split. Maybe it’s better to get rid of it (I d…

[deleted]

Re: US Senate votes unanimously to make daylight savings time permanent

#206

Such a terrible idea compared to permanent standard time. There is plenty of light during the summer, so there's no need to optimize for that. The winter is when daylight is scarce, so that's what should be optimized for.

When it’s scarce you want to waste it on the early morning?

How can you call it "wasted" when it's up to person preference. You do understand there are people who prefer being awake early instead of late right?

Re: US Senate votes unanimously to make daylight savings time permanent

#207

We did this before. 46 years ago. And it went badly. https://www.mercurynews.com/2016/10/30/the-year-daylight-sav... Why do we have such short memories?

That article doesn't say why it was a bad idea. Are we really rejecting this because it'll be dark at 7:35am? Sorry, but that's not even close to a compelling reason not to do this.

Yes, it will be. Schools should adjust time according to the season. Time shouldn't adjust itself according to the school.

Re: US Senate votes unanimously to make daylight savings time permanent

#209
post #67

Such a terrible idea compared to permanent standard time. There is plenty of light during the summer, so there's no need to optimize for that. The winter is when daylight is scarce, so that's what should be optimized for.

The amount of sunlight stays the same. The question is whether you want more of it in the morning or the evening, and there isn't a "correct" answer there. Going by general public sentiment I'm willing to bet it's more towards the latter though.

(Congrats. paxys, you got me to reply twice to you :))

>and there isn't a "correct" answer there

For me, personally, I like the concept that noon is when the sun is at it highest point or closest, I can adjust everything else around that.

Re: US Senate votes unanimously to make daylight savings time permanent

#210

Can someone explain why they actually care about this? I always see such strong opinions on it but really, why does it matter to you? Most clocks are digital and change automatically these days and otherwise changing your clocks twice a year is such a minor inconvenience. And whether or not the light should be preferred in the morning or vending is probably a pretty even split. Maybe it’s better to get rid of it (I d…

i prefer it being around, if only because i come from an area that, in the winter time, has 8 hours of daylight to kick off the season. it's nicer to have that start at 8:30 am instead of 9:30
Post reply on HN