I can understand the concern of other posters about going to DST as opposed to standard time... but at this point, I just want the switching to end. It is such an unnecessary disruption and fixing it seems so trivial.
It's total necessary and a great design. Without this then it would be dark until 8:30 in the morning during winter and the other way the Sun would rise at 4:30AM. These are both bad outcomes so we adjust the clocks so optimize these.
US Senate votes unanimously to make daylight savings time permanent
141–150 of 1001 posts
Re: US Senate votes unanimously to make daylight savings time permanent
#142We did this before. 46 years ago. And it went badly. https://www.mercurynews.com/2016/10/30/the-year-daylight-sav... Why do we have such short memories?
Are we really rejecting this because it'll be dark at 7:35am?
Sorry, but that's not even close to a compelling reason not to do this.
Re: US Senate votes unanimously to make daylight savings time permanent
#143Can someone explain why they actually care about this? I always see such strong opinions on it but really, why does it matter to you? Most clocks are digital and change automatically these days and otherwise changing your clocks twice a year is such a minor inconvenience. And whether or not the light should be preferred in the morning or vending is probably a pretty even split. Maybe it’s better to get rid of it (I d…
b) if you're someone who has a strong preference for when they do outdoor activities, day vs night can make a big difference
c) if you wake up in the dark, work all day, then drive home in the dark it's kind of a downer (latitude dependant)
Re: US Senate votes unanimously to make daylight savings time permanent
#144Does this mean that I will no longer be able to smugly remind people that there is only one 's' in "daylight saving time"? It was really the only reason I could see for keeping the biannual time change around.
I mean, “Daylight savings time” is a commonly used term. At some point it just becomes accepted as a valid alternative.
Re: US Senate votes unanimously to make daylight savings time permanent
#145We should move the standard work day to 10-6 to compensate.
Re: US Senate votes unanimously to make daylight savings time permanent
#146Important note: "Senator Marco Rubio said after input from airlines and broadcasters that supporters agreed that the change would not take place until November 2023."
Re: US Senate votes unanimously to make daylight savings time permanent
#147Can someone explain why they actually care about this? I always see such strong opinions on it but really, why does it matter to you? Most clocks are digital and change automatically these days and otherwise changing your clocks twice a year is such a minor inconvenience. And whether or not the light should be preferred in the morning or vending is probably a pretty even split. Maybe it’s better to get rid of it (I d…
I understand that there are other people with lifestyles that benefit more from sun in the morning, and they aren’t wrong, they are just different.
Re: US Senate votes unanimously to make daylight savings time permanent
#148Fuck this. Keeping the DST change is still better than keeping DST permanently. We should stay on standard time all year, I'm sick of having 0 daylight in the morning when I get up.
Re: US Senate votes unanimously to make daylight savings time permanent
#149We did this before. 46 years ago. And it went badly. https://www.mercurynews.com/2016/10/30/the-year-daylight-sav... Why do we have such short memories?
Re: US Senate votes unanimously to make daylight savings time permanent
#150And why will it fail when it gets there, or be stuck in committee forever before reaching the floor, or have some nonsensical pork attached to it? I have no faith in my government to do something as nice as give me a little sunshine in the evening...