Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's just a conveyor belt of bs. I can't disable comments, chat, etc. I don't care about uploading shorts. I'm tired of constant redesigns or moving things around. I just want to see videos related to what I search for or channels I'm subscribed to. I instantly feel like I'm capital to be maximized rather than a respected user when I open YouTube. Edit: While typing this they felt the need to use a push notification…
> I can't disable comments, chat, etc. Comments under video are just a thin 50px tall bar, just don't click on it? Just like you don't have to scroll down on the web. Just fullscreen and watch your video. > I don't care about uploading shorts Then don't press the shorts button? > I'm tired of constant redesigns or moving things around I don't think youtube gets that much redesign. On android, the biggest recent chang…
Vanced has been discontinued
371–380 of 422 posts
Re: Vanced has been discontinued
#372Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am on YouTube since around 2009. I have never, ever bought something a YTer mentioned in a sponsored segment. They get paid just for talking about the products, what's the difference if I skip the segment manually, or if a plugin does it automatically?
IMO, quality wise, sponsored segments advertise better products than the YT ads. In most cases, they are tied to the video/creator and the creator talks and advertises them because they themselves use it. They feel a lot more organic and targeted than anything the YT algo ever showed me.
For me as a european, quite a lot of physical items which are being sponsored are not available in my country, so the ads for these are essentially useless.
The rest of the ads are VPNs(which I already got), various SaaS which I have absolutely no use for or things I already know (and don't want).
Online ads are already annoying and useless to me, but sponsored segments are even worse.
At least I don't feel bad for skipping these segments because AFAIK, creators just have to integrate these segments into the videos, that's it. The advertisers can't know if I've seen the segment so the creator gets paid the same, doesn't matter if I watch or skip it.
Re: Vanced has been discontinued
#373Earlier quoted context omitted.
Upgrade to a YouTube Premium family plan for $14.99/mo and have no ads in YT either...
I have no desire to pay 15 for the ability to play videos with the screen off
Re: Vanced has been discontinued
#374Earlier quoted context omitted.
Rather than just dis, could you be specific? It works for me, and I know a number of people who use it since they find it is better for them than the official client.
- Video playback breaks regularly and it takes 4-5 days for fixes to hit F-Droid. This is waaaay too slow. - Random other stuff keeps breaking, not that the 100+ lines of recursive Java gibberish in the crash popups tell you what broke (but the crash reporter itself does break regularly, too) - App structure is counterintuitive: You have tabs on the main screen, and the side bar... duplicates the tab buttons, but tur…
Re: Vanced has been discontinued
#375Earlier quoted context omitted.
Years ago I drew a big red line in the sand for myself: no ads ever, for any reason, ever. If a service cannot fulfil this, I don't pay for it or use it. Makes the decision easy for me.
So does that mean you're paying for YouTube Premium (which explicitly stops showing ads when you give them those 10 bucks a month) or did you just move the goalposts here?
Re: Vanced has been discontinued
#376Re: Vanced has been discontinued
#377Re: Vanced has been discontinued
#378Re: Vanced has been discontinued
#379Earlier quoted context omitted.
> "This post glows" That didn't used to be a "g" there, would be my guess.
Oh, that is just dumb
(A comment that "glows" would usually be something like: hey fellow members of radical political ideology, who is up for letting those politicians know what lead tastes like? Let's conspire to commit domestic terrorism!" )
Re: Vanced has been discontinued
#380Surprised it took so long to be honest. It was so good and unlike with other youtube alternative clients, you basically had almost 1:1 feature parity over the official app. Plus you had the option to disable almost all the recent UI changes easily and a sponsorblock integration. It was much much more of a threat to Google than newpipe or less "normie" friendly alt clients, and it was getting too popular for it's own…
I believe that's because unlike other alternative clients it is a modified version of the official app.