Live data from Hacker News

Bitbucket now rocks Git

blog.bitbucket.org

11–20 of 183 posts

Re: Bitbucket now rocks Git

#11

You know, I actually expected that the opposite would happen: GitHub would start offering Mercurial hosting. Because Git isn't what attracts most people to GitHub. It's the sheer fact that GitHub is frickin' HUGE and has lots of people who will show up, fork your project, and send you a pull request. I love Bitbucket, but honestly if GitHub added Mercurial support I would probably move all the way to GitHub because o…

They do support HG in a way. See http://hg-git.github.com/

Re: Bitbucket now rocks Git

#12

This is really good news. The greatest strength they have over Github right now is unlimited private git repositories (github only allows 1 private repo for free accounts), free of charge.

I'm pretty sure Github don't allow any private repos on free accounts (at least I can't create any).

Re: Bitbucket now rocks Git

#13

This is great news, very exciting for people who need a nice place to stash all their private git repos but didn't want to upgrade their GitHub plans for not-that-important projects. Very interesting that they've decided to compete directly too. I wonder if/how GitHub will respond. I strongly prefer their UI and already have a paid plan, but I find myself shuffling repos within the confines of that plan rather than s…

I agree -- I have too many repos I'd like to keep private to host them on github, but would love to if I could.

I'm currently paying for a prgmr instance just to run gitolite (https://github.com/sitaramc/gitolite) so I could have a private place to store remotes for my repos. I'm planning to move to bitbucket immediately.

Re: Bitbucket now rocks Git

#14
I use GitHub mainly for private repos. I think I will actually move my private repos over to Bitbucket.

I really like GitHub Issues though. Does Bitbucket have anything similar? I don't see it on their site.

Re: Bitbucket now rocks Git

#15
post #10

Free unlimited private repos for up to 5 users; with competition like that maybe we'll see github improve it's pricing.

I doubt it. There is no need for them to, they aren't hurting or struggling.

Running businesses with "lets offer more for free" and "ohh crap, they offer more for free, lets lower our price" is a race to the bottom.

It is actually moves like these that make me question Bitbucket more. How viable is the service long term? Do I want to trust all my own code to them?

Re: Bitbucket now rocks Git

#16

This is great news, very exciting for people who need a nice place to stash all their private git repos but didn't want to upgrade their GitHub plans for not-that-important projects. Very interesting that they've decided to compete directly too. I wonder if/how GitHub will respond. I strongly prefer their UI and already have a paid plan, but I find myself shuffling repos within the confines of that plan rather than s…

For me and where I work, GitHub's repo restrictions are the one and only cause of us self-hosting a Git server instead of using them. We have around a hundred small, low-traffic repos.

Let's put it this way:

* on GitHub, thanks to our repo count, we would be a $200/mo Platinum account

* on Bitbucket, thanks to our user count, we would be a $0/mo Free account, although we might have to upgrade all the way up to a $10/mo account as we're adding some people.

Needless to say, I will be looking hard at Bitbucket now that they're supporting Git.

Re: Bitbucket now rocks Git

#17
post #7

Bitbucket (a popular mercurial hosting site) has added git support. Has any popular git hosting site added mercurial support? This shows which DVCS is winning.

Alternatively it shows which group cares about getting things done, rather than some software winning/losing.

Re: Bitbucket now rocks Git

#18

You know, I actually expected that the opposite would happen: GitHub would start offering Mercurial hosting. Because Git isn't what attracts most people to GitHub. It's the sheer fact that GitHub is frickin' HUGE and has lots of people who will show up, fork your project, and send you a pull request. I love Bitbucket, but honestly if GitHub added Mercurial support I would probably move all the way to GitHub because o…

They do support HG in a way. See http://hg-git.github.com/

I'll grant that only if you allow me to say that Linux runs Microsoft Office natively due to WINE.

Re: Bitbucket now rocks Git

#19
post #10

Free unlimited private repos for up to 5 users; with competition like that maybe we'll see github improve it's pricing.

I doubt it. There is no need for them to, they aren't hurting or struggling. Running businesses with "lets offer more for free" and "ohh crap, they offer more for free, lets lower our price" is a race to the bottom. It is actually moves like these that make me question Bitbucket more. How viable is the service long term? Do I want to trust all my own code to them?

You sound like an apple customer, you get more for same price and consider this a bad thing... Pigs indeed fly.

It doesn't cost them a lot more in infrastructure to provide alternate dvcs - so your point seems to be completly invalid. More and more I'm starting to think that git is some kind of religion.

We benefit from competition between those 2 platforms and in the end this is what should count the most for us - customers.

Post reply on HN