Live data from Hacker News

Finnish govt agency warns of unusual aircraft GPS interference

bleepingcomputer.com

141–150 of 249 posts

Re: Finnish govt agency warns of unusual aircraft GPS interference

#141

The clear suggestion is that it is Russia doing it. Other than as an f-u, I don’t understand why they would though. If I have an effective weapon (GPS spoofer), surely I don’t want to alert the enemy to it, lest they develop defences. So eg say NATO were overreliant on GPS, incidents of spoofing like this will cause them to rethink and reduce that reliance, or harden the system.

They do this so more countries like Finland would join NATO. There is really no other reason.

My question is how come Finland, with their history with Russia, isn't already in NATO ?

Re: Finnish govt agency warns of unusual aircraft GPS interference

#142
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I watched that evaluation yesterday and I think it is spot on and I second your recommendation. Many western officials (as most people) seem to be unable to put themselves into this different environment and framework of values. Knowing a lot about a country helps, but judging them by the values you'd have doesn't help you a bit. Edit: Take the below with a grain of salt, this is one personal experience which can/sho…

No offense but I don't see much difference between this and "a black person was mean to me once".

Indeed, but this was an entire family of mean people, so the prejudice has been justified!

Re: Finnish govt agency warns of unusual aircraft GPS interference

#143

The clear suggestion is that it is Russia doing it. Other than as an f-u, I don’t understand why they would though. If I have an effective weapon (GPS spoofer), surely I don’t want to alert the enemy to it, lest they develop defences. So eg say NATO were overreliant on GPS, incidents of spoofing like this will cause them to rethink and reduce that reliance, or harden the system.

> GPS spoofer), surely I don’t want to alert the enemy to it, lest they develop defences What normally happens is the GPS stops working and then you lose your satnav, so you dont know where you are going until you reset the satnav and even then it might not work. This is why Streetview logged all the wifi it could find and uses wifi to roughly place a phone in an area to make the gps locating algorithms faster. Now i…

> Society is constructed in such a way to be dependent on others and have to trust others which means you can be manipulated by more knowledgeable persons.

I would describe it as co-dependence in order to be able to have a combined knowledge base greater than any single person could contain. You make it sound like a weakness rather than a strength!

I cannot explain how floating points work, but I can explain how linear regression works. This scales up millions of times as people rely on expertise differentials and not first principals.

I am both pawn and player.

Re: Finnish govt agency warns of unusual aircraft GPS interference

#144
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Whenever there's large NATO exercises in Northern Norway, these things start happening. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_192351.htm

Please don't just drop a link but elaborate a bit what your trying to say by posting that link. Was expecting something interesting GPS jamming related, but the article doesn't even contain the word "GPS". You likely posted it to tell there are currently NATO exercises going on in northern Norway. Your post could have benefited from adding this bit of info.

No post body was provided.

Re: Finnish govt agency warns of unusual aircraft GPS interference

#145
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes ofcourse we are all the same, people. But we people have been brought up in different cultures and been fed different naratives so we act differently depending on what we have been brought up to. We can learn to be one way or other to a certain degree.

Going on a different tangent, I watched an interesting video [1] from The Behavior Panel podcast attempting to discern tactics from Putin's social cues in parallel to the trustworthiness of his messaging and, whether the historical context he provided were reliable or not. I think I can reasonably conclude from watching their perspective that he's masterful in deception. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCXGQzuaNi…

Do you think you should worry about Putin's social cues, or the one's our governance leaders give? Which is more meaningful in your life?

Re: Finnish govt agency warns of unusual aircraft GPS interference

#147
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, it might be so but what's the point in Russia pissing off Finland while a good chunk of its forces is dedicated to the war in Ukraine? They're irrational but surely going "Let's start a war on TWO fronts!" is a step too far even for them?

There's no way Russia pissing Finland off to any conceivable degree would risk war or military retaliation from present-day Finland. None. The same goes for any other Nordic (and Baltic) countries. The current Russian regime likes to demonstrate its power now and then, though, and to try and project its influence through intimidation. They can do that with their significantly smaller neighbours with no risk of milita…

Well they may push Finland to Nato, which is a major strategic fuckup on Russian part. Considering how Finns are generally portrayed in Russia I think its stupid to be a direct Russian neighbor and claim neutrality now... there is no such thing as neutrality in this case.

Re: Finnish govt agency warns of unusual aircraft GPS interference

#148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Somehow I feel like this is a decent time to bring up Chesterton's fence again https://fs.blog/chestertons-fence/

Like I mentioned elsewhere, this offensive holds no rational grounds even if you try hard to see it through a Russian lens - this is why they keep inventing new reasons of invasion on the fly (e.g. the biolab stuff, etc.) So still clinging to the thought that Putin has some kind of grand plan behind him is wishful thinking at best

It looks very rational to me. I say that as someone who lives across the Black sea and have suffered under their rule and feels for the Ukrainians.

Placing weapons next door to any powerful entity is recipe for conflict. It sounds like you're repeating the same talking points over and over.

Russia felt threatened and attacked. What did the US do to Cuba when the Soviets put weapons there? Oh, that's right. Eternal embargo. No war because they couldn't risk it at the time.

How can you feel so rightous is beyond me

Re: Finnish govt agency warns of unusual aircraft GPS interference

#149
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Russia generally acts rationally. It's just that the assumptions and axioms on top of which rationality is applied is different from the West and ― apparently ― not uncommonly delusional. This made it very hard for the West to believe what Russia was saying for years about Ukraine, for example. Further, the explanations seem to differ whether they're addressed to Russians or to other countries. Russia's own populatio…

Putin's approval rating in Russia has only increased since the war in Ukraine started. Also, Russian weaponry has only improved since the fall of the USSR. I'm not sure why you're arguing that Russia cannot do what they are currently doing.

How do you square approval being stronger with russians fleeing the country?

Re: Finnish govt agency warns of unusual aircraft GPS interference

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In all honesty, we don't know anything about anything. Did the jamming really happen, did Russia do it, etc? There are in fact reasons why anti-Russian countries would undertake this themselves, or even just make up the story. The reasons being that it drums up support for their cause, draws lines that people have to be on one side or another, etc. Ultimately, this is an epistemological question - what do we know? An…

> Is trusting those sources really an acceptable basis for any autonomous individual to proceed? You yourself are awefully fond of basing elaborate narratives on dubious sources, which is fine, but why then stoop to high-school debate club level gaslighting like "Ultimately, this is an epistemological question - what do we know? And the only things one can say one knows, is stuff you have personally verified.", unles…

I'm sorry? What elaborate narrative am I based on? What dubious sources?

If you think my point about how you know something is satire, you are mistaken - I am serious.

The problem is that most people are unable to discern what they know from what think they know (aka belief). Because they saw it on a screen or other people say so this. This is NOT knowing. Watching something on a screen only means that you know you saw something on a screen, not that what you saw was faithfully portrayed! You didn't believe Independence Day was real, but you do believe the news, etc is.

Knowing is not easy, but believing we know is.

Post reply on HN