Live data from Hacker News

A short conversation with a bank

newsletter.danhon.com

121–130 of 316 posts

Re: A short conversation with a bank

#121
Yeah, this is why I don't miss living in the US, like, at all. Sure, you can make mad cash and all, but the overall infrastructure is just way-below-third-world.

My particular moment of truth was when I noticed that my Pacific Bell cell phone bills stopped arriving. The first month, the USPS could possibly be to blame, but the second month, I called Customer Service to figure out what was going on.

So, first question, last 4 digits of your SSN. Answer, as ever: 1234. Eh, no, WRONG, try again!? Eh, yes, my SSN ends in 1234?! No, sorry, it does not, I cannot talk to you, bye!

Eh, yes, okay... So, try again the next day, hopefully that agent will be more clued in? Nope, no way, disconnected again.

So, visited the PacBell store near my office. Same thing, the person in the store is, like, visibly shaken after checking my account. can't do anything to help me, can't tell me what is wrong.

TL;DR: my cell phone got disconnected (most likely for nonpayment) after another month or so. Tried to sign up with AT&T, but got denied, because my 'nonpayment' was already recorded on my credit file, so, yeah.

Ended up calling every number in the PacBell SoCal range, and finally got through to someone who took pity on me and was willing to listen to me, and got my account and credit restored.

A few months later, PacBell drained my account by issuing hundreds of direct debit orders for my monthly cellphone bill. They eventually stopped doing that, but never reimbursed me for any overdraft fees. I was almost evicted due to bounced checks because of this, but nobody cared.

I've lived most of my life therefore and after in the EU, and while life here definitely is not perfect, I've NEVER had trivial issues like the above almost cause me to be homeless. So, I guess there's a startup idea in there somewhere? /s

Re: A short conversation with a bank

#122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cannot reproduce - my emails from Amazon have the subject "Your order of X" and contain a link to X.

It must vary by customer, none of my emails about my Amazon orders EVER contain any information about the items ordered, they just have a status and the order number. I once talked to their customer service to ask how to stop getting the emails since they're basically entirely useless and they told me there's no way to do that.

Not only that; it seems even your chosen language has an impact.

The mails from Amazon.de in German do not contain any information about ordered items. From the same Amazon.de, to the same mail address, but in Czech, they do.

Re: A short conversation with a bank

#123
post #111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Now it makes sense. Can you enlighten me? Why don’t they include that in the email receipt?

To prevent Google from tracking purchases. Google scans all email that passes through its servers and parses out who bought what. If the information isn't in the email, it makes it harder for Google to do this. Presumably Amazon wants to keep this information for its own competitive advantage. Further reading: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/17/google-gmail-tracks-purchase... Also, your comments seem to be auto-dead for…

Google parses purchases for that feature, but it looks like Google denies using it for targeted advertising. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30653102

Re: A short conversation with a bank

#124
post #96

A short conversation with Blue Shield of California last month: BS: Have a question? Ask us via this very useful secure messaging form! Me: Great! Can you explain the difference between these two arcane out-of-pocket limits that you display that are un-Googleable and nowhere in your documentation that I can never find anyway? BS: Sure! We will wait two days and then send you an email suggestively titled "a response t…

> go bankrupt /../ the wrong doctor at the right hospital This is the real problem. If we could solve that , none of the rest would be an issue.

I thought that was already solved by the No Surprises Act that went into effect this January.

Re: A short conversation with a bank

#125

> with Gmail, where you were so aggressive about mining receipt data from Amazon that when I get a receipt from Amazon now it doesn’t actually include what I bought Wow, he's right. The item name no longer appears on emailed receipts I receive from Amazon as of about late 2019 or early 2020. I can't think of a plausible explanation for this change other than preventing Google from pilfering your detailed purchase his…

[deleted]

Re: A short conversation with a bank

#126

One thing that really needs to start taking hold in the public consciousness is that credit unions are far superior to banks in almost every way. They usually offer 100% of the same services but with lower (or no) fees, and with far less bullshit. I've been a member of multiple CUs and every time I've had a problem, I just walked in, described the situation, and they just fixed it. If I call, I don't get bounced arou…

I want this to be true, but when looking at both home and auto loans, the CUs around me were not remotely competitive on rates.

Most credit onions just resell the loans anyway (ours doesn’t if it has a term 10 years or less, which got us some decent rates).

Re: A short conversation with a bank

#127

> with Gmail, where you were so aggressive about mining receipt data from Amazon that when I get a receipt from Amazon now it doesn’t actually include what I bought Wow, he's right. The item name no longer appears on emailed receipts I receive from Amazon as of about late 2019 or early 2020. I can't think of a plausible explanation for this change other than preventing Google from pilfering your detailed purchase his…

Cannot reproduce - my emails from Amazon have the subject "Your order of X" and contain a link to X.

My order receipts have what I ordered but the shipment and delivery notifications no longer do.

Re: A short conversation with a bank

#128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It must vary by customer, none of my emails about my Amazon orders EVER contain any information about the items ordered, they just have a status and the order number. I once talked to their customer service to ask how to stop getting the emails since they're basically entirely useless and they told me there's no way to do that.

Not only that; it seems even your chosen language has an impact. The mails from Amazon.de in German do not contain any information about ordered items. From the same Amazon.de, to the same mail address, but in Czech, they do.

This sort of solution belongs in the article.

Re: A short conversation with a bank

#129
post #86

A short conversation with Blue Shield of California last month: BS: Have a question? Ask us via this very useful secure messaging form! Me: Great! Can you explain the difference between these two arcane out-of-pocket limits that you display that are un-Googleable and nowhere in your documentation that I can never find anyway? BS: Sure! We will wait two days and then send you an email suggestively titled "a response t…

Oh wow. Blue Cross hosed that? Max Out of Pocket: This is the yearly maximum accumulation that an insured individual must pay before the insurer takes on full financial responsibility for subsequent claims. This comes in generally one of two flavors: a family or individual. The individual is straightforward. If you have a MOOP of $1000, and you've paid out $1000 in copays or coinsurance after meeting your deductible…

This is almost true: you will, in fact, be forever on the hook for any medical expenses charged which exceed the "reasonable" limits your insurer has set for each given service, even after you've exceeded your MOOP. So if your physical therapist charges $150/hour and your insurer reimburses $120/hour, you'll still owe $60 OOP for two hours of therapy even if you've exceeded your MOOP. Ask me how I know.

Re: A short conversation with a bank

#130
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have found that, as long as your name is on the check, they will allow you to deposit a two-party check via the BofA app.

I've deposited checks that were not even signed and made out to another (and the person who gave me the check didn't sign it over either!) on mobile banking apps. I never sign the check for mobile or check the box on the check if there is one.

Our credit onion mobile deposit is obviously checked by a human and they’ve actually bounced a check back as needing both signatures.
Post reply on HN