Live data from Hacker News

uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

addons.mozilla.org

111–120 of 416 posts

Re: uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

#111
post #76

I instantly install this extension whenever I work on a new machine as I could not imagine browsing the web without it. For that reason I just went looking for a donate button to help fund the project and it turns out they don't even accept donations https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Why-don't-you-accept-...

Quoted post unavailable.

The pronoun "they" is enough if you don't know the person's gender[1] ;).

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singular_they

Re: uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

#112

I instantly install this extension whenever I work on a new machine as I could not imagine browsing the web without it. For that reason I just went looking for a donate button to help fund the project and it turns out they don't even accept donations https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Why-don't-you-accept-...

I prefer DNS filtering over extensions as they generally want all permissions to essentially impersonate you at the browser level. Am I wrong?

You're not wrong. We're all placing immense amounts of trust in uBlock Origin. I often say that the blockers should be fully integrated into the browsers themselves in order to solve the trust problem. It's sad that it can't happen due to conflicts of interest.

Re: uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

#113
I have a website bringing a lot of money using ads. I don't attempt to detect adblockers, or deter users from using them, and use them myself.

ublock origin is wonderful. If one day, everybody is using it and I can't make money from ads anymore, I'd say it would be a sad day for my wallet, but a great day for humanity.

Re: uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

#114

How do ya'll feel about the idea that adblock can be morally equivalent to theft[1]? I see this argument pop up from time to time in relation to people who use alternative clients to services such as YouTube. But if you're using uBlock Origin, you are probably browsing many, many sites that rely at least partially on ad revenue, so it's a similar case. [1] https://twitter.com/LeaVerou/status/518154828166725632

If piracy isn't morally equivalent to theft, then I'm not sure how adblocking would be.

Personally I think there is a stronger argument that dirtying up the Internet with advertising is more immoral than piracy.

Re: uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

#116

What kills me is even paid subscription sites like WSJ, Bloomberg, Seeking Alpha, show you ads even when you're a paying member. Why is it a war on our attention?

The fact that you're able and willing to pay is exactly what marks you as a desired target. You can't spend your way out of people wanting your money; they'll always want more.

Re: uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

#118

I instantly install this extension whenever I work on a new machine as I could not imagine browsing the web without it. For that reason I just went looking for a donate button to help fund the project and it turns out they don't even accept donations https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Why-don't-you-accept-...

I prefer DNS filtering over extensions as they generally want all permissions to essentially impersonate you at the browser level. Am I wrong?

DNS is better, but I find that you need to have a dns server rather than modify/update the host files on router because it'd kill it.

Pihole is great, but you have to maintain a pi. It's not hard, but the other issue is also training and education when users/family is not on it.

In the end, subscription purchases for youtube, help because the ads are really horrible on mobile platform and not blockable easily on iphone.

I went all over the place with this comment, but I agree DNS level is better then browser level. The IP is still enumerated on a browser adblock level, but not on a DNS level.

Re: uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

#119

How do ya'll feel about the idea that adblock can be morally equivalent to theft[1]? I see this argument pop up from time to time in relation to people who use alternative clients to services such as YouTube. But if you're using uBlock Origin, you are probably browsing many, many sites that rely at least partially on ad revenue, so it's a similar case. [1] https://twitter.com/LeaVerou/status/518154828166725632

If the site owner views it that way, they can detect my adblocker and put up a paywall.

And if they're afraid that a paywall will cause people to bounce, then deep down they know what I already know: their content isn't worth paying for.

Re: uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

#120
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

did you really have to add the pronouns mate? "that's a great point" would suffice wouldn't you agree?

The upvote button is fine if all you want to say is "great point"
Post reply on HN