Live data from Hacker News

uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

addons.mozilla.org

101–110 of 416 posts

Re: uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

#101
post #7

I prefer Ad Nauseum ( https://adnauseam.io/ ) because I don't want to just block the ads I want to ruin the profile ad companies have on me by having all the ads clicked as well.

I really like the concept but I would be concerned about having my Google account banned the instant it becomes popular

This is one of the reasons I now use my own domain name

Re: uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

#103

I instantly install this extension whenever I work on a new machine as I could not imagine browsing the web without it. For that reason I just went looking for a donate button to help fund the project and it turns out they don't even accept donations https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Why-don't-you-accept-...

I prefer DNS filtering over extensions as they generally want all permissions to essentially impersonate you at the browser level. Am I wrong?

Most ad services now swap their ad JS domains frequently, aggregate snippets (ads and functional) over a Tag Manager, or simply even proxy the ad scripts through the main domain, which a DNS filter cannot block reliably.

Re: uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

#104
post #30

The most popular extension, and the 2nd most popular, just like the 6th, 7th, 9th and 10th most popular, are ad-blockers. I guess it's only marketers that love targeted ads...

Only marketers love ads in general. To the rest of us, it's just annoying noise, to be filtered.

From an older submission to Hacker News: "Appreciate marketing. It seems like bullshit, but it’s bullshit I don’t want to have to do. I’m glad someone else is doing it, I’m sincerely grateful for their efforts." [0]

Software development is important, but marketing is also important, and it actually works. Most companies can't survive without effective marketing.

[0] https://devjac.dev/posts/2021-05-29-my-personal-creed-of-emp...

Re: uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

#105

I think it's only a matter of time until adblock is legally banned. The current situation, where the vast majority of the internet relies solely on ads and an increasing number of people use adblock year over year is unsustainable. The system can support a certain number of free riders (people who consume the product but don't contribute back in ad eyeballs), but at a certain point the math will no longer work. Event…

There’s definitely an option #3 here: ad-blockers eventually lose the arms race. We’re already partially there.

I think this is most likely sadly.

There has been no working adblocker for twitch.tv for over a year now. As far as I know, they are splicing the ad directly into the main video stream while it’s playing, so there’s no way to differentiate it from the content at all.

Surely it’s only a matter of time before youtube starts doing this too.

Re: uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

#106

What kills me is even paid subscription sites like WSJ, Bloomberg, Seeking Alpha, show you ads even when you're a paying member. Why is it a war on our attention?

They also include ads in print versions of newspapers and magazines that you subscribe to, and always have. Advertising has always been a component of making them viable businesses: the problem isn't the existence of ads in things you pay for as much as the obnoxious way they are implemented on the web.

Re: uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

#107

I instantly install this extension whenever I work on a new machine as I could not imagine browsing the web without it. For that reason I just went looking for a donate button to help fund the project and it turns out they don't even accept donations https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Why-don't-you-accept-...

I prefer DNS filtering over extensions as they generally want all permissions to essentially impersonate you at the browser level. Am I wrong?

Wrong, no. It's a compromise. Addons have the ability to filter advertisements that cannot be identified by their domain name or ip. They also can take actions to compensate for website failure when ads are blocked.

Re: uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

#108

I think it's only a matter of time until adblock is legally banned. The current situation, where the vast majority of the internet relies solely on ads and an increasing number of people use adblock year over year is unsustainable. The system can support a certain number of free riders (people who consume the product but don't contribute back in ad eyeballs), but at a certain point the math will no longer work. Event…

Legally banning adblock will open up a large can of worms that I don't think anyone really wants to probe into. Third party "ads" can run shady, if not outright malicious JavaScript. If "adblocking" becomes illegal, does it logically follow then that a visitor to a website is legally compelled to allow the site's shady-ass code to run on their computer? That would likely fail in the courts, and it might cause inverse…

What happens when the people who grew up without the internet die and all that's left is the people that have been watching youtube since they were 3. Won't the vast majority of people be using adblockers?

Re: uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

#109

I instantly install this extension whenever I work on a new machine as I could not imagine browsing the web without it. For that reason I just went looking for a donate button to help fund the project and it turns out they don't even accept donations https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Why-don't-you-accept-...

I prefer DNS filtering over extensions as they generally want all permissions to essentially impersonate you at the browser level. Am I wrong?

You’re not necessarily wrong, however there are whole categories of ads and tracking that cannot be prevented by DNS blocking.

Re: uBlock Origin becomes top addon on Firefox

#110

I wonder how the post manifest v3 world will look like and how much it'll affect uBlock Origin on Chromium based browsers. Even now, several features, such as CNAME uncloaking, happen only on Firefox.

Some Chromium based browsers plan to just continue supporting v2 extensions regardless what Chrome does e.g. https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/issues/20059
Post reply on HN