China's state media buys Meta ads pushing Russia's line on war

Post by desmosxxx » Fri, Mar 11, 2022, 12:22 AM UTC

bananabiscuit wrote: post #165

yks wrote: post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are linking some links that don't imply what you imply. Yes, there are biolabs, and yes, some of them are Army-affiliated because COVID happened in the army, and yes, UA Army works with DoD. But there is no connection whatsoever there with the "US-made bioweapons" or even "bioweapons" in general so basically you are just promoting conspiracy.

I did not make any statements about existence of bioweapons. You said “There is nothing in the video saying the biolabs belong to the US, stop spreading conspiracy misinformation.” I pointed out that there is in fact US DoD funded research in Ukrainian bio labs. I have no idea if they are making bioweapons. I can’t prove that they are, you can’t prove that they aren’t. But I do know that Victoria Nuland stated in tha…

Post by rnjesus » Fri, Mar 11, 2022, 4:27 AM UTC

sofixa wrote: post #413

bigcat123 wrote: post #401

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am amused that one who know neither Chinese and Russian languages confidently claim that their media are lying, based on the reporting that one knows as biased. Let's put in this way. One saw a black box. One was told that the black box contains some nasty staff. One knows that the above statement is biased. One then claim that the black box contains the nasty thing. See how bias anchored one's thought, even if cle…

You know that Russian and Chinese media have English versions, and Google Translate and similar can be used to translate the original versions? The absolutely publish complete bullshit.

Post by throwaway473825 » Fri, Mar 11, 2022, 10:38 AM UTC

bakuninsbart wrote: post #325

ksec wrote: post #161

>Good WSJ article on Russia vs. China. In a nutshell, China miscalculated the situation. They will likely look to limit their bet (on Russia) for fear of becoming Russia 2.0 to the West. [1] The tweet is from Neil Cybart and WSJ. You may know him as one of the more accurate Apple analysts. And most people still to this day think either China miscalculated it, or China's official stance is somewhat unclear. ( Paul Gra…

As the WSJ article correctly points out, China immediately tried to caution the Russians in their invasion, China also never recognized the peoples republics of Luhansk and Donetzk, and didn't even accept Russia's annexation of Crimea. In the UN, China and others abstained instead of voting with Russia, and China on multiple occasions stressed the independence and importance of territorial integrity of Ukraine. It is…

Post by bigcat123 » Fri, Mar 11, 2022, 2:46 PM UTC

sofixa wrote: post #444

rnjesus wrote: post #443

Earlier quoted context omitted.

his point is, have _you_ translated these things for yourself or just relied on someone else to do so?

Yes, i have. It's not worth the bytes it took to get to me and i wonder what kind of cynic would even try to write so blatantly wrong bullshit.

Post by lenkite » Sat, Mar 12, 2022, 4:15 PM UTC

LaMarseillaise wrote: post #340

actuator wrote: post #320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, to be fair if you remove restrictions then it is the Western version of events that will rules as they have the established platforms and money to spread info. To see their power look at the French poll of who won them the World War. It became 20% in the recent decades from 57% for Russia https://www.france24.com/en/20190601-who-won-wwii-russias-ro...

The idea that the Soviet Union won WWII is itself propaganda and ignores the contributions of many, many nations, not to mention the entire Pacific war. Also, the liberation of France was exclusively the western allies.