Live data from Hacker News

Why offer an Onion Address rather than just encourage browsing-over-Tor?

alecmuffett.com

21–30 of 134 posts

Re: Why offer an Onion Address rather than just encourage browsing-over-Tor?

#21

> Using onion services mitigates attacks that can be executed by possibly-malicious “Tor Exit Nodes” — which, though rare, are not nonexistent Is there any evidence that the majority of exit nodes aren't malicious? There's only 300 or so in the US, 300 or so in Germany, and in other countries even less. What would it take for three letter agencies to compromise most of it? I mean, suppose all of the existing nodes we…

Or just use HSTS. Problem solved.

Re: Why offer an Onion Address rather than just encourage browsing-over-Tor?

#22
post #6

Most of the technical points listed here are pretty much entirely mitigated by TLS. Exit nodes can of course deny access to specific sites, but hidden services suffer from comparable (or worse) issues. There are no other practical attacks that malicious exit nodes could execute against sites using TLS and HSTS preload lists. If you’re a website administrator, fixing those things should be your priority before impleme…

But, but … BUT TLS man-in-the-middle at exit node isn’t fully mitigated … UNLESS TLS Client mode is used as well. We all should know how infrequent this TLS Client mode get evoked, right, right? Yeah, righto.

Wat? That's not true (i assume by client mode you mean client certificates aka mutual-tls)

Re: Why offer an Onion Address rather than just encourage browsing-over-Tor?

#23

> The first benefits are authenticity and availability: if you are running Tor Browser and if you click/type in exactly the proper Onion address, you are guaranteed to be connected to what you expect — or not at all. What? Writing raw onion addresses is like writing raw IPv6 addresses. Nobody can remember then and check them. What is easier > https://nytimes.com or > ej3kv4ebuugcmuwxctx5ic7zxh73rnxt42soi3tdneu2c2em55…

Neither. Either can be mistyped. Nobody enters addresses directly anymore. Either you google them or you get them from bookmarks.

It's very easy to think that things we do ourselves are universal because they seem so intuitive and natural for us. I for one type addresses from scratch all the time.

Re: Why offer an Onion Address rather than just encourage browsing-over-Tor?

#24
I think the only legit reason (assuming your clearnet site is using HSTS) is that .onion site reduces the risks of users screwing up. And i suppose better performance if you don't have to use exit bandwidth (i would guess, dont actually know)

Users are bad at security. If they fail to set up tor, .onion links don't work, so it acts as a barrier against users shooting themselves in the foot.

This is counterbalanced by higher phishing risks.

Re: Why offer an Onion Address rather than just encourage browsing-over-Tor?

#25
I think some comments here are misunderstanding the intent of the article. For those saying TLS already solves... it is not advocating Tor as a replacement for transport layer security, indeed most Tor users also use TLS (and site certs) with little overhead.

No, the article is asking how you could, as a website owner, make things easier on Tor users and yourself! It starts with the assumption that you care, and want to help users who require better privacy.

It answers, though not in detail, the many HN readers who invariably post replies concerning Tor that "All my abuse comes through Tor".

Creating an .onion address mitigates that significantly.

Re: Why offer an Onion Address rather than just encourage browsing-over-Tor?

#26
I think the avoiding exit nodes part is probably the most important to me. Exit nodes have always been problematic - from memory about 20% of relays have an exit flag but most of the traffic is directed to the most performant relays. Tor actively discourages using the network for file sharing because of the exit node bottleneck.

I think there are probably some uses of the Tor network that aren't fully realised yet - file sharing (something similar to I2P) which avoids the exit node using onion addressing and chat applications (like Briar which uses onion addresses, or Secure Scuttlebutt).

As for web traffic, it is nice to offer an onion address. I wonder if websites could offer an "upgrade" to onion addresses, similar to how IPFS does?

Re: Why offer an Onion Address rather than just encourage browsing-over-Tor?

#28

I think the avoiding exit nodes part is probably the most important to me. Exit nodes have always been problematic - from memory about 20% of relays have an exit flag but most of the traffic is directed to the most performant relays. Tor actively discourages using the network for file sharing because of the exit node bottleneck. I think there are probably some uses of the Tor network that aren't fully realised yet -…

Yes there is the onion-location http header to upgrade from clearnet to .onion [0]

[0]: https://community.torproject.org/onion-services/advanced/oni...

Re: Why offer an Onion Address rather than just encourage browsing-over-Tor?

#29

I think some comments here are misunderstanding the intent of the article. For those saying TLS already solves... it is not advocating Tor as a replacement for transport layer security, indeed most Tor users also use TLS (and site certs) with little overhead. No, the article is asking how you could, as a website owner, make things easier on Tor users and yourself! It starts with the assumption that you care, and want…

I'm not clear from the article how having an onion address helps website operators who receive abusive traffic through Tor. Perhaps some of that abusive traffic will come in via the onion address instead, but presumably such an operator will want to continue serving their regular site to Tor exit nodes as well, so I don't see how it would actually mitigate anything, nor make the malicious traffic easier to segregate from valid traffic over Tor. What am I missing?

Re: Why offer an Onion Address rather than just encourage browsing-over-Tor?

#30
post #24

I think the only legit reason (assuming your clearnet site is using HSTS) is that .onion site reduces the risks of users screwing up. And i suppose better performance if you don't have to use exit bandwidth (i would guess, dont actually know) Users are bad at security. If they fail to set up tor, .onion links don't work, so it acts as a barrier against users shooting themselves in the foot. This is counterbalanced by…

> This is counterbalanced by higher phishing risks

I would argue that this is the much bigger footgun for users. Just look at how much money darknet users are losing to the big industry of .onion phishing pages.

Post reply on HN