Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

axios.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

451–460 of 784 posts

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#451

Post by ripper1138 »

dwighttk wrote: post #319
toastercat wrote: post #71

I tried being a Twitter user for a bit last year, mostly because a lot of engineers I admire use it to communicate about interesting topics and also their work. But after a while, I realized even they will pollute my feed with politically divisive topics, whether it be from them retweeting something, or liking a tweet, or even entering into the fray themselves -- Twitter will find a way to get me to see it. For a whi…

One thing that helps (a tiny bit) is to go to newest tweets first instead of the algorithm. This cuts out all of the likes (which are 99% noise for me… I wish I could make it so people didn’t see my likes, that is what retweets are for!) Still gonna get the retweets, but you won’t get the most “engaging” stuff brought to your attention which tends to be the worst.

Predictably, when I changed my feed back to newest tweets, I spent wayyyy less time on Twitter. Which is great.

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#452

Post by themaninthedark »

AussieWog93 wrote: post #338
themaninthedark wrote: post #310

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would ask you to think back to 2019 when a large majority on Twitter and from the mainstream media took a picture of some high school boys in Washington DC and brandied them about as the face of racism in America. "He has a racist smirk"

Do you have a link to this? I Googled the quote at the end and just found this weirdo tweeting under the hashtag #RealNiggas4Romney.

Here is a medium article that preserved a bunch of the tweets and a wiki article.

I remember(maybe mis-) some reddit comments at the time about the kid's smirk. There was also a buch of comments about "punchable face"

https://medium.com/@RevolutionaryId/twitter-democratizing-mo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_2019_Lincoln_Memorial_...

>In the wake of the publication of the longer video, CNN Business reporter Donie O'Sullivan described the twitter video uploaded by "2020fight" as the one that "helped frame the news cycle" of the previous days, and characterized the video as a "deliberate attempt" to mislead and "manipulate the public conversation on Twitter"—a violation of Twitter rules.[76] According to Molly McKew, an information warfare researcher, the tweet had been boosted by a network of anonymous Twitter accounts to amplify the story.

To add to my point of 'OK': On January 22, shortly after tweeting it, comedian Kathy Griffin deleted a Twitter message in which she accused Covington basketball players making an OK gesture of "throwing up the new nazi sign".

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#453

Post by rvz »

typeofhuman wrote: post #6

I don't engage on Twitter out of fear. I sometimes see posts that I like and want to retweet but I don't because it means I'm endorsing everything the author has ever said or ever will say. It's not worth the risk. People in my demographic face significant exposure to "cancelling" or ambushing for wrongthink. So it's best for me to avoid it entirely.

> So it's best for me to avoid it entirely.

Good decision.

To win the social media game it is to not play it at all.

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#454

Post by Manuel_D »

AussieWog93 wrote: post #338
themaninthedark wrote: post #310

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would ask you to think back to 2019 when a large majority on Twitter and from the mainstream media took a picture of some high school boys in Washington DC and brandied them about as the face of racism in America. "He has a racist smirk"

Do you have a link to this? I Googled the quote at the end and just found this weirdo tweeting under the hashtag #RealNiggas4Romney.

There was massive coverage over this incident: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_2019_Lincoln_Memorial_...

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#455

Post by cgrealy »

CodeGlitch wrote: post #250
cgrealy wrote: post #203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

While I agree in general, there are plenty of circumstances where people don't get to not have an opinion about things. For example, you can't "agree to disagree" on LGBTQ rights if you belong to one of those categories. See also pregnant people and abortion rights.

Quoted post unavailable.

No post body was provided.

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#456

Post by dwaltrip »

deanCommie wrote: post #434
jameskilton wrote: post #12

"Never pass up a chance to keep your mouth shut" Words my Dad taught me as I was growing up, but only really sank in the last 5 or so years ago.

Quoted post unavailable.

> If you think there is an opportunity to improve the world

That’s a big if :)

Most of us usually forget to think about that before opening our mouths.

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#457

Post by wpietri »

LAC-Tech wrote: post #431
wpietri wrote: post #420

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

It isn't what he said, but it's apparently what he meant. Again with the mind-reading. Maybe people don't want to talk politics because so many people debate in bad faith and not only put words in peoples mouths, but thoughts into their heads.

No post body was provided.

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#458

Post by calumetregion »

vecinu wrote: post #231
calumetregion wrote: post #177

Highly online life leads to instability. It's like living your life in a packed subway car. Stress response. This is why cities are less healthy for you as well.

> This is why cities are less healthy for you as well. Is there a citation for this? First time I've heard this said. If that were true wouldn't all the ultra wealthy avoid living in cities at all?

I definitely chose my phrasing by design: "less healthy"

I have no doubt there are vigorous academic arguments happening whether there are ways to mitigate the stress of population density and be healthier than would be expected. I'm open to that concept and ideas.

Yet the research on urban living and mental health is overwhelming - your chances of schizophrenia, mood disorders and anxiety skyrocket in cities. I was born in a large metro and lived on both coasts in huge urban areas, and I wish this weren't true because I like the energy of a city.

But you get a couple of whiskeys in me at dinner and I'll flat out say there's almost zero way to make a city healthy. People on top of each other, tremendous noise, light pollution and bad air quality leads to poor health for many people, as well as conflict.

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#459

Post by jstream67 »

AussieWog93 wrote: post #338
themaninthedark wrote: post #310

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would ask you to think back to 2019 when a large majority on Twitter and from the mainstream media took a picture of some high school boys in Washington DC and brandied them about as the face of racism in America. "He has a racist smirk"

Do you have a link to this? I Googled the quote at the end and just found this weirdo tweeting under the hashtag #RealNiggas4Romney.

https://nypost.com/2020/07/24/washington-post-settles-250m-s...

heres one link. search term is covington kid.

basically just another case of left aligned news stations casually labelling everyone they don't like as 'racist'

Re: The new silent majority: People who don't tweet

#460

Post by LordDragonfang »

madrox wrote: post #273
vorpalhex wrote: post #146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One of my pet theories for why social media is such a cesspool is that it exposes us to the whole of someone else. If I play boardgames with Sue, that's enough. We meet, enjoy a beer and play some Catan and go our separate ways. That's a fine relationship. If I follow Sue on social media, now I know her politics, religion, sex life, drug usage, opinions on every little thing.. and frankly, I don't care or want to. I'…

My favorite theory comes from an HN comment describing it as the "toaster fucker problem." I'd attempt to re-explain it, but the original comment is great (and easy to search for. Not many mentions of the phrase "toaster fucker" on HN.) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25667362

Same author, further down in the thread:

> All these twitter/facebook/youtube bans are trying to put a genie back in a bottle, Parler is gaining steam

Did not age nearly as well.

Post reply on HN