Build or don't build a software feature?
dont.build
Build or don't build a software feature?
1–10 of 45 posts
Re: Build or don't build a software feature?
#2Re: Build or don't build a software feature?
#3this is a survey?
Re: Build or don't build a software feature?
#4Re: Build or don't build a software feature?
#5Why is the result always between 5% and 95%?
Re: Build or don't build a software feature?
#6A nice additional feature would be a way to bookmark a set of slider values, so that it can be shared with others.
Re: Build or don't build a software feature?
#7Re: Build or don't build a software feature?
#8Great job on this decision making tool. One thing that might be missing - the business viability of the feature. All else being equal you prioritize features that add value to the company that builds them.
Re: Build or don't build a software feature?
#9Interesting approach for a decision calculator. Why is the result always between 5% and 95%?
Looking at the page's , I think it's because they set the minimum score to 1 rather than 0.
In addition, for three of the questions, a high score is seen as a negative rather than a positive (e.g. a high score in "development effort" likely means "a lot of effort"), so behind the hood they invert those scores by doing (10 - score).
The problem is then that positive questions have a range from 1 to 10, and negative questions have a range from 0 to 9, and the means you have a minimum score of 3 and a max of 57, rather than 0 and 60.
For a more flowery answer: A developer never deals in absolutes :)