Live data from Hacker News

Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most unusual demands ever

arstechnica.com

101–110 of 693 posts

Re: Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most unusual demands ever

#101
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Never, actually. Also you are wrong that the only use is crime. There are literally millions of stories in the last 13 years of cryptocurrency that demonstrate this. But of course keep screaming at the sun if you wish.

Millions? I'd struggle to name 3.

I'll start: the 10k pizza

Re: Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most unusual demands ever

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AMD and Intel did it. The excuses ring hollow.

At least from my understanding AMD did so by making a new open source driver while the old one remained closed.

Irrelevant. It would be relevant if others could write an open source driver. Which, effectively, they can't.

Re: Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most unusual demands ever

#103
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What long list of reasons? LHR has absolutely zero impact on games. If anything, its presence was helping gamers because miners were at least somewhat put off buying LHR GPUs, making them more available to gamers.

"You don't own your hardware" is a very long list in my book.

By that metric you never did, and LHR doesn't change anything here. It's just yet another out of million optimizations baked into the drivers already, except this one is on BIOS level.

Re: Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most unusual demands ever

#104
post #51

I imagine Nvidia doesn't own the rights to the complete source code of the driver. Even if they wanted to open source it things move slow in big companies.

I would imagine that ownership of Nvidia's drivers would be more clear cut than most open source projects. Wouldn't it only be Nvidia's employees and contractors that have worked on the driver code? Then by default Nvidia would own the rights. If Nvidia doesn't own the code, do you then imagine they're in a sort of licensing agreement with the rightsholders that allows them to distribute the binary blobs but not the…

It could be as simple as using a third party library or snippet of code which they don't have the license to give out the source code for.

Re: Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most unusual demands ever

#105
post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> You realise crypto is more stable then most developing worlds governments? It's not.

Source: "trust me, bro" Here you go, kid: https://www.statista.com/statistics/326707/bitcoin-price-ind... https://www.statista.com/statistics/371895/inflation-rate-in... A great insight would take into account more prominent cryptocurrencies and 3rd world countries but you don't throw pearls before swines.

The claim was "more stable than most world governments".

And inflation isn't the only criteria of stability for a government.

But you're correct about pearls before swine though.

Re: Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most unusual demands ever

#106

Imagine if they actually leaked the driver source and verilog files though...

It's the 'secret Coca Cola recipe' leaked to Pepsi situation: The source code is still protected by copy rights and patents. AMD cannot just take it.

There are countries that don't care about US IP laws. China comes to mind.

Re: Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most unusual demands ever

#107

I'm not a big fan of limiting hardware to run only approved software. One day it's for limiting crypto mining, the next day it will be for limiting our ability to use strong encryption. It's a slippery slope.

Isn’t this the case in many different products? E.g. I can buy a car which has certain features “locked”, because it’s cheaper for the manufacturing company to have a single production line, and helps ease supply chain / inventory management as well.

Re: Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most unusual demands ever

#108
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The US is a small part of the world. Just a reminder. You can open a bank account in the EU that allows depositing cryptocurrency. The US is on the decline. It's propaganda is great, though.

Chine -> banned crypto currencies EU -> plans to strongly control or outright ban crypto currencies US -> might also move against crypto currencies Idk. about India, Japan etc. but if EU and US moved they will likely follow. Just to be clear I'm speaking about crypto currencies like we think about them now, I'm sure there is a future for blockchain based currencies, potentially even spear headed by governments.

Doesn't India pretty well want to control their own money? Even more strongly than others?

Not that they at same time aren't willing to provide services, just paid for in fiat...

Re: Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most unusual demands ever

#109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's the 'secret Coca Cola recipe' leaked to Pepsi situation: The source code is still protected by copy rights and patents. AMD cannot just take it.

There are countries that don't care about US IP laws. China comes to mind.

And, with the current crisis in mind, Russia. They'll be looking to expanding their local semiconductor production from now on.

Re: Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most unusual demands ever

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am suggesting a monetary system that is beyond the influence of the state is a good thing.

Good for criminals and rogue states, certainly.

Sure, but also the dissident, someone fleeing a war zone, someone having their life savings destroyed by bankers and politicians…

It’s ok if you don’t have a use for decentralized money. I hope you never need it, and continue a sheltered life of luxury and convenience.

Post reply on HN