Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Single-person creations that have stood the test of time?

news.ycombinator.com

321–330 of 375 posts

Re: Ask HN: Single-person creations that have stood the test of time?

#321

Tech stuff? This japanese developer that has been regularly updating his stuff for years and years. Simple. Efficient. Runs on anything. Although not super well known: https://shirouzu.jp/ Non tech stuff? The standard design nail clipper is something probably most of take for granted. Invented by David Gestetner and used all over the world. I feel like this is the kind of thing that people might end up missing in a r…

You really need both a knife and a spoon for complete toenail maintenance

Re: Ask HN: Single-person creations that have stood the test of time?

#323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is such a fascinating observation to me. Why has literature largely resisted team based creation? Writing teams exist for other mediums, but literature is almost exclusively written by a single creator who then loops others in after the work is completed.

I think this is how software development should be done as well. Software, like literature, requires one to hold all the context in order to avoid contradictions and to get things to fit together. I think in most cases the best software is made by one or two individuals rather than large teams. And don't even get me started on how much faster it is. Scrum is the mind-killer.

In software, as in writing, you have editors which request changes during the review process. Nowadays one person can't hold the whole program in his head. Some people lack soft-skills and so they pursue the myth of the solo developer.

Re: Ask HN: Single-person creations that have stood the test of time?

#324
I'm surprised (or I missed some part of the entire thread) nobody mentioned Bittorrent! The entire protocol and the original client was designed by one person: Bram Cohen. Think about some of the most efficient way to distribute large data over the internet and there is one single mind behind it. Of course, there are plenty of fancy GUI-powered clients today but the very original idea belongs to one person. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bram_Cohen

Re: Ask HN: Single-person creations that have stood the test of time?

#325
post #163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It was amazing that within ~24hrs of Linus releasing `.git` there were corresponding implementations of the backing data store within ~1 week for all the other "major" competing version control systems (eg: hg, svn, darcs) and written in just about every possible language. The core of git is brutally simple and efficient, and maps incredibly well to "a linked list (and hash) of files serialized to disk". Someone wrot…

But, he didn't. Linus copied the design from Monotone, by Grayson Hoare (who also made the original pre-pre-1.0 Rust).

https://lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/6/121

"PS. Don't bother telling me about subversion. If you must, start reading up on "monotone". That seems to be the most viable alternative, but don't pester the developers so much that they don't get any work done. They are already aware of my problems ;)"

time for monotone to be rewritten in Rust

Re: Ask HN: Single-person creations that have stood the test of time?

#326

List of video games supposedly developed by just one person: https://www.gamespot.com/gallery/the-14-best-games-developed... I say supposedly because I know Jonathan Blow paid someone to do all the art for Braid, and licensed all the music (I even saw him demo Braid before release with his programmer art at GDC back in 2008, it did not look anywhere near as pretty, so he made the right choice). But the artwork was so…

An interesting solo game dev is also Jason Rohrer [1, 2]. I'm not a gamer, but I found his frugal work and life philosophy inspiring.

1: http://hcsoftware.sourceforge.net/jason-rohrer/

2: https://usesthis.com/interviews/jason.rohrer/

Re: Ask HN: Single-person creations that have stood the test of time?

#327
post #315
post #313

Earlier quoted context omitted.

maybe think of it as "ash" the newly fused element is more massive than the ones it came from and sinks to the bottom (core) When enough "ash" is accumulated (and the star is still big enough) the previous ash begins fusing into some new heavier "ash" rinse and repeat until you get to iron "ash" but no further. the reason is; every fusion lighter than iron is exothermic two atoms fuse into something bigger than eithe…

I do get that part, but I like your description. The thing that I was interested in is whether or not a helium atom in the Earth‘s atmosphere has a way to be sucked into the fusing layer at some point. It just seems from everything that I’ve learned over the years that there’s a net outflow of that would likely keep the little atom some distance away even if it left Earths gravity well.

I see, if you are not already part of the "in crowd" below the photo-sphere can you get past the solar wind bouncers.

I don't know, but think it would be tough for a lone atom.

Post reply on HN