Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: A more social, Amazon-free alternative to Goodreads

booqsi.com

11–20 of 197 posts

Re: Show HN: A more social, Amazon-free alternative to Goodreads

#11
Impressive! It's a lot of work building a product like that.

Please support export of a user's data. I just lost all of my Goodreads data when some system problem of their's deleted all my data. I'm pretty mad about it, but at least I had a data export from eight months ago so not all is lost.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30503465

Re: Show HN: A more social, Amazon-free alternative to Goodreads

#12
post #10
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are goodreads imports allowed? Isn't that kind of data sometimes against terms of service (for obvious anti-competitive reasons)?

GDPR demands a machine readable export of your data. You could import that and I can't see how this could violate any ToS.

Just noting that GDPR is an EU law, not an international one.

Re: Show HN: A more social, Amazon-free alternative to Goodreads

#13
I'm glad someone's making this! I've been wanting an alternative for a while. I do have two questions:

1) Why can't I browse the site without an account? Is this temporary for the beta phase or a persistent design choice?

2) Do reviews allow GIFs? (I'm not willing to make an account just to see if existing reviews have gifs, and oddly enough, gifs would be a deal breaker for me).

Re: Show HN: A more social, Amazon-free alternative to Goodreads

#15
post #10
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are goodreads imports allowed? Isn't that kind of data sometimes against terms of service (for obvious anti-competitive reasons)?

GDPR demands a machine readable export of your data. You could import that and I can't see how this could violate any ToS.

Well I don't think importing tweets and displaying them is allowed by their ToS for instance (even though some apps do), nor instagram pics.

Re: Show HN: A more social, Amazon-free alternative to Goodreads

#18
I once was part of a now-defunct reading forum in my teens.

On the forum, people would package three related books into quests. A boring example would be a dystopian quest pack with three books about three very different dystopian scenarios.

But the quests people put together were usually more interesting. I remember a "Weird Magic" quest had books with really unconventional magic systems. I found Motherless Brooklyn (detective with Tourette's) in a quest pack of "heroes with issues". Other quest ideas would be evil protagonists, alien first-contact with the wrong guy, and stuff like that. You can often find three books for even the goofiest of quests.

It was a cool way to find new books. And whenever you didn't know what to read next, you'd look at what quests you were still working on and choose among them. Once finished, your completed quest count would increase.

Long append-only lists of genre-related books were never as interesting to me. Quests only having three books made them a fun thing to collect. Maybe there's something fun there that new goodreads competitors can experiment with.

Re: Show HN: A more social, Amazon-free alternative to Goodreads

#19
post #9

Booqsi looks really pretty and I love that it supports local bookstores! Are there plans to support imports from Goodreads? I know many people who have curated their shelves for years so that might be an important feature for them to switch over. I've been using and loving an alternative, https://www.thestorygraph.com/it has similar vibes to Booqsi and also includes a Goodreads import, AI based recommendations, and s…

Are goodreads imports allowed? Isn't that kind of data sometimes against terms of service (for obvious anti-competitive reasons)?

Goodreads allows you to export your library via CSV.

Re: Show HN: A more social, Amazon-free alternative to Goodreads

#20
+1 to importing from Goodreads (and, also, from my Amazon digital content list aka kindle-purchased books). I'm happy to go through an export/import cycle for these, but starting from scratch on booqsi without a bootstrap sets the bar too high.

And I agree 100% with your core sentiment: Goodreads is weirdly low-value.

Post reply on HN