Live data from Hacker News

Russia to restrict Facebook access for 'censoring' its media

reuters.com

111–120 of 291 posts

Re: Russia to restrict Facebook access for 'censoring' its media

#111

Theoretically, the main point here is that Facebook has an independent fact checker program, and some of those fact checkers rated Russian media posts (which would lead to a big scary overlay and a reduction in views) I'd guess they would have used some other excuse to block Facebook sooner than later anyways though.

"independent", are you really able to say it with straight face? I'm not even talking of russian posts, it is as partisan as can be, supporting Dem agenda and suppressing GOP.

Re: Russia to restrict Facebook access for 'censoring' its media

#112
Russian here. Most comments here are pure nonsense. The only reason Facebook risks getting blocked is because in Russia it is predominantly used by dissidents and people in opposition to Putin's regime. It doesn't block groups, events, etc at Kremlin's behest. So it should be blocked.

Upd: many commenters here clearly misread my comment, or maybe it's my poor English. "It should be blocked" means that it is in Putin's interest to block it, but better under some pretext. I am personally in a very sharp opposition to Putin's criminal syndicate.

Re: Russia to restrict Facebook access for 'censoring' its media

#113

Theoretically, the main point here is that Facebook has an independent fact checker program, and some of those fact checkers rated Russian media posts (which would lead to a big scary overlay and a reduction in views) I'd guess they would have used some other excuse to block Facebook sooner than later anyways though.

Quoted post unavailable.

He didn’t said he believed that I think. They do have an independent fact checker. Wether that’s effective or makes sense is another question.

Re: Russia to restrict Facebook access for 'censoring' its media

#114
post #18

In the 2000s and 2010s Russia lowered bandwidth on Western social media (and webmail) platforms to promote local alternatives. It worked and most Russians are not on Facebook, twitter and reddit. However Russia failed to suppress and replicate YouTube that is the only massively popular Western platform in Russia.

That's nonsense, top to bottom. There were no technical means for that, not to speak of the intent (the censorship laws were implemented in 2013). The centralization which made slowing something down technically possible only really began in late 2015 or so, and wasn't ready till 2018. The reason most Russians aren't on Facebook is VK and OK. Reddit just never took off because there were plenty of domestic alternatives long before it, and Twitter is super popular. And 'Russia' is not a single entity.

Re: Russia to restrict Facebook access for 'censoring' its media

#115
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

Many of your points aren't true at all. You appear to be trying to make a false balance (a term I learned today) by casting doubt on the censorship and brutal repression of protests we know China performs. We have a bounty of evidence that WeChat is heavily monitored and censored. You can in fact test it today. We know that the recent anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre was heavily censored and dissidents de…

No post body was provided.

Re: Russia to restrict Facebook access for 'censoring' its media

#116

Russian here. Most comments here are pure nonsense. The only reason Facebook risks getting blocked is because in Russia it is predominantly used by dissidents and people in opposition to Putin's regime. It doesn't block groups, events, etc at Kremlin's behest. So it should be blocked. Upd: many commenters here clearly misread my comment, or maybe it's my poor English. "It should be blocked" means that it is in Putin'…

> it is predominantly used by dissidents and people in opposition to Putin's regime [...] So it should be blocked.

Well, at least your stance is clear. Obviously most will disagree with a government blocking a site for being used by the current leader's opposition.

Re: Russia to restrict Facebook access for 'censoring' its media

#117

Russian here. Most comments here are pure nonsense. The only reason Facebook risks getting blocked is because in Russia it is predominantly used by dissidents and people in opposition to Putin's regime. It doesn't block groups, events, etc at Kremlin's behest. So it should be blocked. Upd: many commenters here clearly misread my comment, or maybe it's my poor English. "It should be blocked" means that it is in Putin'…

> it is predominantly used by dissidents and people in opposition to Putin's regime [...] So it should be blocked. Well, at least your stance is clear. Obviously most will disagree with a government blocking a site for being used by the current leader's opposition.

I don't think you're reading the post charitably or correctly.

Re: Russia to restrict Facebook access for 'censoring' its media

#118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How much have they changed their minds in the last few days?

How much have they changed their minds in the last few days? Enough that there are protests in most major Russian cities against the invasion of Ukraine. Just yesterday, Moscow police arrested over 1,000 protesters. They can only keep up that pace for so long.

Really? non-democratic regimes have proved again and again that the plebes can be contained.

Re: Russia to restrict Facebook access for 'censoring' its media

#119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

Evil is a pretty strong word to toss around like that. The Nazis were evil. How is the West evil? Western countries do a number of bad things, but they're not evil.

Drone assassination programs are pretty evil.

Oh wait, did you mean evil to us, or evil to everybody else?

Re: Russia to restrict Facebook access for 'censoring' its media

#120

Theoretically, the main point here is that Facebook has an independent fact checker program, and some of those fact checkers rated Russian media posts (which would lead to a big scary overlay and a reduction in views) I'd guess they would have used some other excuse to block Facebook sooner than later anyways though.

Quoted post unavailable.

Independent != Unbiased!

Facebook, of course, can hire biased independent fact checkers. At least Facebook is not 100% determining truth of everything on their own.

Post reply on HN