Can I suggest to please write what the bug was about in the title as it happens often that old bugs are closed years later.
Basically it wasn't a bug but a request to add some capability like security to extensions - useful for more powerful extensions like GreaseMonkey or in this case the one I was using Chickenfoot https://www.sitepoint.com/rewrite-web-chickenfoot/ which allowed you to do all sorts of things in scripts running inside an extension in the browser which might end up being dangerous. Basically extensions have changed a lot…
An enhancement request I submitted to Bugzilla 15 years ago was just closed
91–100 of 129 posts
Re: An enhancement request I submitted to Bugzilla 15 years ago was just closed
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
My two most important extensions were my adblocker, and Vimium (enable Vim-like control in Firefox). The new WebExtension API broke Vimium, with no replacement possible[1]. Meanwhile, I never had problems with extension clashes. I appreciate that this improved the code base quality for Mozilla folks, but it was a significant step down in features for me. I even switched to Vivaldi (which has built-in Vim keybindings)…
I know you might not be interested in anything chromium-based since this thread is about firefox, but qutebrowser[1] is a great solution for anybody looking for vimium/pentadactyl-like experience. [1] https://qutebrowser.org/
qutebrowser on the other hand seems to have limited support for addons and the builtin features are good, but not on par with what addons can give you (https://github.com/qutebrowser/qutebrowser/issues/28).
Re: An enhancement request I submitted to Bugzilla 15 years ago was just closed
#93https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122752
Incredible really how things have moved on since this issue.
Re: An enhancement request I submitted to Bugzilla 15 years ago was just closed
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would appreciate it if an HN moderator would change the title.
I agree that that should be changed, but dollars to donuts (as I have seen this happen many times before) the moderators rename it to the title of the bug and the entire point is lost ;P. (Though maybe they read this and think again; in the future to make such a point you first need to write a comprehensive article on your own blog with this as the title and then you mostly get to editorialize all you want... you jus…
Re: An enhancement request I submitted to Bugzilla 15 years ago was just closed
#95This bug is from 20 years ago and still isn't solved. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122752 Incredible really how things have moved on since this issue.
Re: An enhancement request I submitted to Bugzilla 15 years ago was just closed
#96Re: An enhancement request I submitted to Bugzilla 15 years ago was just closed
#97Re: An enhancement request I submitted to Bugzilla 15 years ago was just closed
#98Re: An enhancement request I submitted to Bugzilla 15 years ago was just closed
#99Anyway, how is Mozilla to work for? I always thought it must be great, but recently reading about the firings and project cancellations it doesn't seem so rosy anymore.
Re: An enhancement request I submitted to Bugzilla 15 years ago was just closed
#100> "legacy" extensions are gone
While I agree that housekeeping large backlogs is commendable, this bug was if anything fixed by "accident", and is no more a fix in the traditional sense than closing a bug for an EOL operating system because the issue described no longer exists.