Live data from Hacker News

Things you notice when you quit the news (2016)

raptitude.com

241–250 of 741 posts

Re: Things you notice when you quit the news (2016)

#241
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm a firm believer in quality over quantity when it comes to news. Google News has gotten increasingly annoying though, forcing me harder toward the "personalized" results, the kind of filter bubble I'm intentionally trying to avoid. What worked well for me was getting a print subscription to the Economist. They definitely have a bias (particularly in their editorials), but it's mostly of the "free trade" variety, w…

I prefer an RSS reader with a personally curated list of news outlets.

What are some good sites with RSS feeds? I was sad to see that Reuters doesn't have it.

Re: Things you notice when you quit the news (2016)

#242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

About a decade ago I started reading law blogs instead of the news. They're written for other lawyers, so they're well composed, often without excessive hyperbole. The writing is far higher quality than typical journalism. They're actually informational in terms of describing the mechanisms behind power in our society. In terms of focus, if something is truly important there will always be a legal analysis. Celebrity…

Do you have any suggestions for blogs that you like? Would be interested in adding some to my info diet.

In India, Live Law is pretty good.

Re: Things you notice when you quit the news (2016)

#244
post #174

A great way to quickly catch up is to use something like the BBCs "What's the papers say" page [0] or similar alternatives. It gives both a broad overview and also an opportunity to see different perspectives on the same news. [0] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-the-papers-60457518

There's also the daily 'The Papers' front pages:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cpml2v678pxt

Which is a great way to see all the points of view (in the UK) on one page.

Re: Things you notice when you quit the news (2016)

#245

I've uninstalled Facebook and stopped reading / watching the news. I read HN and a few local subreddits via RSS. I do feel much better mentally. I would, however, like a way to be informed of breaking news. I tried a few apps but their idea of "breaking" news often involved celebrity gossip. I really only want to know if its MAJOR: war breaks out, aliens land and make contact, fusion is finally perfected and we're al…

Wikipedia current events page is your friend. It has a executive summary of about the last week or two and then a daily breakdown if you want more detail

Re: Things you notice when you quit the news (2016)

#246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

About a decade ago I started reading law blogs instead of the news. They're written for other lawyers, so they're well composed, often without excessive hyperbole. The writing is far higher quality than typical journalism. They're actually informational in terms of describing the mechanisms behind power in our society. In terms of focus, if something is truly important there will always be a legal analysis. Celebrity…

Do you have any suggestions for blogs that you like? Would be interested in adding some to my info diet.

Not a blog, but a (highly opinionated) podcast:

https://www.fivefourpod.com/

Re: Things you notice when you quit the news (2016)

#247
> To be clear, I’m mostly talking about following TV and internet newscasts here. This post isn’t an indictment of journalism as a whole. There’s a big difference between watching a half hour of CNN’s refugee crisis coverage (not that they cover it anymore) versus spending that time reading a 5,000-word article on the same topic

I guess in that respect I've long quit the news. I'm honestly surprised some people still watch TV news, I've cut the cord a long time ago personally.

I tend to go to axios, New York times, Atlantic, Reason, etc., and not on a daily basis, since long form news doesn't get published as often. Been doing that for a while.

Axios is my favorite for keeping up with daily news, no opinion pieces, just reporting on events and a quick summary of why it could matter in a digestible form.

Re: Things you notice when you quit the news (2016)

#248
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

About a decade ago I started reading law blogs instead of the news. They're written for other lawyers, so they're well composed, often without excessive hyperbole. The writing is far higher quality than typical journalism. They're actually informational in terms of describing the mechanisms behind power in our society. In terms of focus, if something is truly important there will always be a legal analysis. Celebrity…

If you're talking about Law 360 and similar sites for legal news, sure. If you're talking about political news, no. Some of the most hyperbolic, partisan, and bizarrely flawed takes on Trump, and the US political situation over the last 5 years, have come from lawyers. It's been embarrassing.

A fair counterpoint: some of the most hyperbolic, partisan, and bizarrely flawed takes have come from Trump's own legal team (looking at you, Giuliani).

But I'm sure we could find bits of embarrassment anywhere we look!

Re: Things you notice when you quit the news (2016)

#249
My family didn't have a TV while I grew up. We had one once, it broke, and my father decided we didn't need another.

As a child this seemed unreasonable and unfair, right up there with not having pizza as often as I wanted, or other similar not-actually-traumatizing problems. Then I became aware of how much time my peers spent staring at TVs, filling their mental spheres with the ephemeral details of forgettable TV entertainment. And none of them were reading anything.

I was very happy we didn't have one.

Later in life I got a TV to watch rental movies. That was great.

Then I tried cable for two years and lived with the dreck for a while. Everything was clearly designed to communicate to stupid people! Even the history and science programs are ridiculously dumbed down.

But the worst by far was the "news". The faux partisan battles that turned into real partisan battles with two (not always equally) incoherent sides. The same people banding together on each side (there are almost always exactly two sides!) of every issue.

BUT worse than the news was the advertising. People are so used to it they don't see it for what it blatantly is. Completely bizarre communication techniques doing only one thing: Brainwashing! Repetition of nonsense phrases, ridiculously happy/sad people, products shown in painfully contrived situations, ...

The problem with news and advertising isn't just that they are misleading, or that they are dumbed down, or that they are designed to be emotionally addictive.

The worst problem is that exposing ourselves to constantly repetitive irrationality creates thinking grooves in our minds. It dumbs us down both in terms of how we think, but even worse, all the higher forms of thinking we never develop, that we are channelled away from.

I quit cable after two years. That was enough for a lifetime lesson. Movies, quality TV series, there are actually enjoyable inspiring things to watch.

But I live a life almost completely devoid of any commercials, and no video news, talks shows, etc., at all.

And by reading I am far more "informed" and more importantly, have a greater, constantly growing "understanding" of people, power, the practical (people) side of economics, etc.

--

I don't think it is a coincidence that the massive societal and personal problems associated with video news and a partially egregious scrapbooking web site are both associated with content produced to coerce us to watch advertising we would otherwise never choose to expose ourselves too.

It is all a toxic brew. Avoid all advertising in you life. You will avoid 99% of the junk and be a much better version of yourself.

I have threatened to drop a friendship when a friend kept sending me stupid baiting political memes. He finally understood me: It is not that it was specifically stupid or wrong, it is that I don't tolerate mental poison like that. Not even from a friend.

Re: Things you notice when you quit the news (2016)

#250
I think this misses the cultural and social reasons to read the news. Anecdotally, friends that don't keep up with the news or are more politically disengaged (i.e. don't vote) seem to have a tougher time making friends, going on dates, hanging out at a party, etc. In many ways, the news seems to serve a purpose analogous to sports in my circles; would anyone say that watching sports is a "waste of time"?

I do agree with the sentiment that cable news is essentially reality TV (with less fun). Reading a New Yorker interview and debating it with friends is certainly healthier than zoning out in front of an endless stream of anger.

Post reply on HN