Earlier quoted context omitted.
The part of standup identifying blockers is to figure out when someone doesn't realize their blocked and/or they're spinning their tires a bit. If someone is blocked they should reach out immediately. Instead, standups provide the team the ability to identify roadblocks the developer might not realize. Perhaps you're working on something and I've been down that path before, and know your solution won't work for reaso…
Has this ever actually happened though?
Times are great for programmers now. How does it end?
571–580 of 611 posts
Re: Times are great for programmers now. How does it end?
#572Earlier quoted context omitted.
> our tooling is so effing slow it needs a 1000x improvement. not in how fast we can write code, just to compile and test the damn stuff Not just that. Why do we have 30 tools for 30 programming languages. JetBrains has one IDE per language (approximately). What happens when I have a project with two languages? It is a mess. Don't get me started about build systems. Something like Bazel is greatly needed which would…
Jetbrains has one IDE (IDEA Ultimate) and redistributes it with various built in plugins for cheaper licensing and marketing. If you get the more expensive Ultimate, it has support for all languages via the same plugins.
Re: Times are great for programmers now. How does it end?
#573Earlier quoted context omitted.
it's only a status meeting for management if management insists on being there. kick them out.
I've been in teams with just developers, being siloed from non-programmers, with a technical manager. It still becomes a status meeting. We can tell them DSU aren't supposed to be status meeting, but it still devolves into one.
Re: Times are great for programmers now. How does it end?
#574I feel like we have so much leverage and don't use it at all. We're still attending stand-ups every day with non programmers telling us when we can and cannot refactor. It's nuts to me that a skilled profession - that not many can do - lets themselves get micro-managed like this. If anyone has read Developer Hegemony , I'm fully on board with that general premise - we start operating like lawyers with partnerships, a…
I own a copy of Democracy at Work and know there are a number of software and IT cooperatives out there...
Re: Times are great for programmers now. How does it end?
#575Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Instead it's there to get everyone on the same page. How do you get everyone on the same page if you cannot ask questions? This whole standup theatre is complete bullshit. It's true it's a waste of time. You say it's only meant to be a quick "status update" 10 minute meeting. What is the point of that if then asking questions is not allowed? If it is allowed then it's true though that for the majority of listeners…
> How do you get everyone on the same page if you cannot ask questions? Not sure why you're asking me this. I welcome questions in standups. And if a question warrants a deeper one-on-one chat, then at least everyone knows an issue has been raised (but often someone on the team knows the answer straight away). They hardly take up time. I suspect we have radically different experiences of standup meetings, hence the p…
Re: Times are great for programmers now. How does it end?
#576Earlier quoted context omitted.
Was coming here to say this. Every time a more sophisticated system has been built to replace a simpler one, it requires MORE programmers, not less.
Ye. I think there is way to much "automation" nowadays. It is like all these business systems corparations use. They would probably be better off with some secretaries with typewriters sending internal paper mail. Systems that try to automate too much are too rigid to use in a sane way. The nice thing with a no computer system, is that if you want to do something, just do it. An analogue would be writing math notatio…
Re: Times are great for programmers now. How does it end?
#577Re: Times are great for programmers now. How does it end?
#578Earlier quoted context omitted.
To be honest I would just throw SCRUM into the trash if I could I think it's garbage but following some not quite SCRUM method which is what most companies do is actually insane. The whole process becomes a micromanagers wet dream.
I used to work at a company where the standup meeting was once per week, and we would pre write everything in a shared doc. The meeting was then just silently reading, only saying something if necessary. A great place of sanity, that was.
Re: Times are great for programmers now. How does it end?
#579Earlier quoted context omitted.
> How do you get everyone on the same page if you cannot ask questions? Not sure why you're asking me this. I welcome questions in standups. And if a question warrants a deeper one-on-one chat, then at least everyone knows an issue has been raised (but often someone on the team knows the answer straight away). They hardly take up time. I suspect we have radically different experiences of standup meetings, hence the p…
It just seems highly unlikely that you are having 10 minute meetings while accomplishing anything beyond the usual small chit chat and banter that almost all social interactions require. It takes ten minutes alone to just gather a group of people, look at each other, and say hello.
If I may challenge your idea: what you describe only applies to teams that don’t meet often.
My team has been doing this daily standup for years. Those 10 minutes are succinct - and effective. We save the chit chat (of which there’s plenty) for our lunch breaks and after hours.
I wouldn’t blame someone for doubting it’s possible. But yeah, in our case, it just works.
Re: Times are great for programmers now. How does it end?
#580Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not entirely sure this is more than a matter of degree. I liked most of your point but I think you devalue aspects of this mode of work discussion. It's important to discuss work and holding yourself to account in a shared endeavour is not of itself bad. I have little doubt it's also used as passive aggressive bullying sometimes.
That's the problem. Anecdotally, for many programmers I spoke with over a 20 years of career, it's not "can be used as passive aggressive bullying sometimes"; it's "almost always". :(
In fact many of the teams I’ve working are fine with people skipping standup if they have any reason to. Currently I skip like half of my teams standups.