Live data from Hacker News

I was wrong, we need crypto

world.hey.com

91–100 of 336 posts

Re: I was wrong, we need crypto

#91
This whole episode is a lesson about the danger of unchecked, centralized power. Any government that has the power to act unilaterally to destroy (financially or otherwise) and imprison anyone they deem "bad" is a government that is a threat to the freedom of everyone. It doesn't matter how benevolent you think they are, or they claim to be. The existence of this power itself is the problem. That's why transparency, checks and balances are so important. Far too many people who claim to believe in freedom and civil rights are actually authoritarians who are merely content that the authoritarians in charge are currently aiming their unlimited power at people they don't like (in many cases, having been conditioned not to like by media arms of the state). It shouldn't matter how much you dislike the truckers or their cause to be aghast at the actions of the Canadian government.

Re: I was wrong, we need crypto

#92
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

One idiot or provocateur in a sea of tens of thousands does not override the 99%. That's an absurd, lazy smear. What this episode makes clear is that many people actually love authoritarianism as long as the actions of the state in the moment appear to align with their own ideology. Next time it won't, which is why it must be resisted on a principled basis. This precedent being set is a dictator's dream come true and…

No post body was provided.

Re: I was wrong, we need crypto

#95

"In just three weeks of honking, blocked streets and bridges, bouncy castles and flag waving, this peaceful protest" Aside from a billion dollars+ in trade blocked when the protest -- having achieved nothing terrorizing the residents of Ottawa and blasting horns/setting off fireworks around the clock -- branched out to trying to block international borders, they harassed schools, healthcare workers, anyone wearing a…

Tyrants understand local police may be hesitant to act against their neighbors under questionable orders. This is why tyrants bring in non-local police who don't have local connections. Outside police will crack skulls and not care because they and their families live elsewhere.

'... Emergency Act allowed other regions to add to the police force without the whole normal process.'

Yes, outside enforcers were needed because local police were not doing it.

Trudeau is one of Schwab's young leaders and has embarrassed Canada. https://www.weforum.org/people/justin-trudeau

Re: I was wrong, we need crypto

#96

> the Canadian prime minister imposed martial law on the protestors No, he didn’t.

Grifters gonna grift anyway they can. For anyone interested in knowing what the emergency act actually entails, and why it's not the war measures act, Elizabeth May has a fairly decent, if not long, speech during the debate: https://youtu.be/-iPsgfuum2c

Re: I was wrong, we need crypto

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> and the majority don't want these Nazi flag waving idiots distrupting their lives. Slightly off topic but the inconsistent treatment/reporting of these protestors and BLM is what gets me. BLM protestors flying "antifa" flags (let's be honest Marxists) are just as bad as Nazis in my book - seriously misled people with unworkable ideas about how the world should be run. Anyway if you're coming down hard on protestors…

> BLM protestors flying "antifa" flags ... are just as bad as Nazis

Let's be clear about what you're saying: people who are vehemently opposed to Nazis are just as bad as Nazis. This is the definition of "fake centrism" or (sarcastically) "enlightened centrism". You're really saying that a new flag created to express opposition to Nazis, fascism, authoritarianism, and genocide is as bad as a flag that has been used for almost a century to represent those exact things? They're just as bad as each other? Are there good and bad people "on both sides", too? You need to seriously take a hard look at yourself in a mirror if you believe this. One group is expressly saying "we should subjugate and genocide non-whites" and the other group is expressly saying "we should not tolerate genocide and subjugation" and they are just as bad in your eyes!?

Re: I was wrong, we need crypto

#98
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Notably, the War Measures Act - which is the original act that was rebranded as the Emergencies Act in 1988 - has only ever been put into effect 3 times in history. 1. WWI 2. WWII 3. FLQ Crisis - an incident that included the kidnapping of federal ministers by a terrorist organization By contrast, this protest has been incredibly peaceful when compared to other similar protests or occupations. There is a debate happe…

This was one year after similar group attacked the American Capitolium. Holding critical infrastructure hostage, threatening the government and harassing people is not peaceful. Invoking the Emergencies Act after 3 weeks was warranted after the police failed doing it's job. The government did not have a clear picture or control over the situation. A foreign organization could have used it to supply these people, whic…

> Invoking the Emergencies Act after 3 weeks was warranted after the police failed doing it's job.

This is what I don’t get. The Canadian police had the power to stop the protestors who crossed the line from protest to riot.

But they didn’t.

I don’t understand why. Why did they allow the ambassador bridge to be shut down so long?

They had the power to stop it. They just chose not to.

Re: I was wrong, we need crypto

#99
This is full of factual errors, and garbage on the face of it.

Canada is a rule-of-law, democratic society. The so-called protestors blocked off major ports of entry leading to material harm to businesses. They also violated the rights of individuals living within the downtown core (including my family) for weeks on end. They brought weapons with them, they built shanties and filled them with kerosene and propane.

The plurality of Canadians voted for the government and the imposition of its lawful and constitutional restrictions in re: COVID. Were they unlawful or in violation of Charter rights, they could have used the courts but elected not to. Because they are lawful and in keeping with the Charter.

Two thirds of Canadians support the use of the Emergencies Act in breakup up the unlawful protests.

As the elder Trudeau said in the October Crisis re: the use of the military (which the junior Trudeau is not planning on doing):

  Yeah, well there's a lot of bleeding hearts around who just don't like to see people with helmets and guns. All I can say is, go on and bleed, but it's more important to keep law and order in this society than to be worried about weak-kneed people who don't like the looks of a soldier's helmet.
If you want to change the Government, vote. Trudeau's Liberals are a minority government meaning they require the support of another major party to continue to be a government. If they fail to pass a confidence bill they will immediately be dissolved and face an election. The average tenure of a minority government in Canada is 1 year, 140 days.

The use of Bitcoin in this manner is anti-Democratic as it seeks to overturn the lawful, constitutional decisions of the plurality - and to overturn the last election.

We have ways of sorting this out in Canada. You vote.

If you see yourself supporting these anti-Democratic viewpoints, ask yourselves: "Are we the baddies?"

[edit] Not only did I not vote for the Liberals in the last election, I'm open to re-evaluating the COVID restrictions too. But not with a boot to the neck. The unlawful protests must end. Then we can talk.

Re: I was wrong, we need crypto

#100
post #53
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They can seize the gold only if they know where it is. And to convert crypto back into Canadian dollars, you will need to go through the "legacy" banking system at any substantial amount, where it can be flagged with standard tools and you would be arrested.

>And to convert crypto back into Canadian dollars the ultimate goal is to never convert back

They can also criminalize accepting Bitcoin for payment for goods, in which case you would have no choice but to convert back to dollars (and taxes will likely always be paid in dollars anyway)
Post reply on HN