Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Be anonymous

kg.dev

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

191–200 of 260 posts

Re: Be anonymous

#191

Post by nly »

3s wrote: post #58
cellis wrote: post #38

As careful as some of the things he suggests are...if you're truly wanted by a state-level actor or sufficiently motivated attacker, you won't be able to hide by simply using VPN and Tor. Especially if you're running something with many transactions like AlphaBay. You would need to obfuscate quite a bit more: - if you're using VPN traffic but most people "around" you aren't, you're a suspicious node; your ISP could e…

You're absolutely right. It is not enough to use anonymity tools, you also have to make sure everything else around you doesn't compromise your anonymity. Made me think of a Harvard bomb threat incident where the student posting a fake bomb threat (through Tor) to avoid final exams was the only person using Tor on campus at the time, which trivially identified him. https://theprivacyblog.com/blog/anonymity/why-tor-fa…

If the threat was posted via Tor, how did they know it was posted by someone on their campus network?

The timing could have been conincedental. Even if he was the only person online on campus at the time, it proves nothing.

Re: Be anonymous

#192

Post by [deleted] »

d0gsg0w00f wrote: post #141
imnotlost wrote: post #138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Re. big pharma, imagine how weary the roughly 400k families of people who dies feel. "Three major drug distributors and the pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson have agreed to a $26 billion settlement with states to resolve thousands of lawsuits over the country's opioid crisis, officials announced Wednesday." https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/4-companies-near-26-bil... None of these executives were anonymous or…

In that vein you have to also prosecute alcohol distilleries, tobacco companies, fast food companies, casinos, lotto companies, ice cream makers, and any other company that makes something that people struggle to control their own consumption. And we do, that's why we have government. At least you have a recourse when these companies operate within the law.

[deleted]

Re: Be anonymous

#193

Post by borski »

nly wrote: post #191
3s wrote: post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're absolutely right. It is not enough to use anonymity tools, you also have to make sure everything else around you doesn't compromise your anonymity. Made me think of a Harvard bomb threat incident where the student posting a fake bomb threat (through Tor) to avoid final exams was the only person using Tor on campus at the time, which trivially identified him. https://theprivacyblog.com/blog/anonymity/why-tor-fa…

If the threat was posted via Tor, how did they know it was posted by someone on their campus network? The timing could have been conincedental. Even if he was the only person online on campus at the time, it proves nothing.

Yes, but the confession that ensued after they told him he was the only one using Tor proved everything. :)

Re: Be anonymous

#194

Post by makach »

I believe that truly anonymous can only be achieved in bursts, and not continuously maintained. For day to day existence, blending in with the common population is hiding in plain sight.

Re: Be anonymous

#195

Post by sockbot »

BbzzbB wrote: post #158
notsoanonynous wrote: post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tor is amateur hour. The Feds can easily deanomymize things where a server is up 24/7 servicing requests. The author of this article is also very wrong: Anonymity is not on a spectrum. It’s all or nothing. Like a Mario game where any mistaken encounter makes you start over (and that’s if you don’t get in trouble for what you did). First step is to understand that any system could be bugged. Every IRL confidant could…

>Anonymity is not on a spectrum Is it not, for the non-criminal user? My HN, Reddit and Twitter accounts are "anonymous" (pseudonymous would be more accurate), and it matters to me to the extent I share thoughts I would not on Facebook or if Googling my name lead straight to it - not that I'm ashamed of them, I try to be decent (tho I slip at times and am more brash than I would IRL), it's just that they hold some pe…

Changing the definition of anonymous to include pseudonymous is not a compelling argument that anonymity is the same as pseudonomity.

Re: Be anonymous

#196

Post by sndwnm »

notsoanonynous wrote: post #167
Riverheart wrote: post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not nearly on the level as what is being suggested but my company has had several anonymous surveys and I started thinking about writing style when taking them. If you're prone to certain phrases, words, use of contractions or lack thereof, especially when the pool of people is small and you're providing critical (but needed) criticisms, you could potentially be identified by your immediate supervisor. Introducing ty…

I am open to ideas for how to mitigate this remaining vulnerability even further

Maybe not very practical, but to combat targeted writing analysis on the internet you could try running such analysis software on your own writing to find out what makes it stand out. Work to make the writing as "bland" as possible, perhaps with aid of software translators or filters.

Re: Be anonymous

#197

Post by fsflover »

hanniabu wrote: post #97
fsflover wrote: post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Linux is definitely more anonymous than Windows/Mac, but if you seriously want to be anonymous, you should use Qubes with Whonix.

What exactly positions those ahead of Linux?

https://www.qubes-os.org/faq/#how-does-qubes-os-provide-secu...

Re: Be anonymous

#198

Post by shrimpx »

sampo wrote: post #76

Maybe Eric S. Raymond's advice from 21 years ago is no longer true in today's internet: > Concealing your identity behind a handle is a juvenile and silly behavior characteristic of crackers, warez d00dz, and other lower life forms. Hackers don't do this; they're proud of what they do and want it associated with their real names. So if you have a handle, drop it. In the hacker culture it will only mark you as a loser…

I guess Eric Raymond never wanted to talk random banter about sports games on Reddit without his employers knowing about it.

Re: Be anonymous

#199

Post by saos »

Really good. I’m always cautious of how I say things on Reddit as to not give too much away. I’m sure Reddit data scientists can build all sorts of models based in comments from users

Re: Be anonymous

#200

Post by imdsm »

As much as dark mode is becoming a thing, I can't read light on dark text without it messing with my eyes. It has to be the worst way to render text.
Post reply on HN