Live data from Hacker News

Be anonymous

kg.dev

31–40 of 260 posts

Re: Be anonymous

#31

The article touches on a good point: one mistake and you're out. It doesn't even have to be your mistake - you didn't choose to put your SSN out there after all, yet here we are. This gave me a radical company idea, on the other end of the spectrum: spam as a service. Something that'll take your name, email, and other things and put it all over the internet in questionable and plausibly denial ways. That way, even wh…

Kidding aside, this is exactly how it will go down. Politician in a scrape of financial corruption or etc.? Deepfake s*x video or other viral blatant misinformation & obfuscation; what's the risk? Upside, no one knows what to believe. Exactly what various "countries" are doing. It will be extreme; to the point where, don't believe half of what you actually see.

Re: Be anonymous

#32
The article presents a spectrum, dismisses both extremes, and advocates that people aim for the middle. The problem is, you may think you are hanging out in the middle, but you probably have much less privacy than you think you do. Even if you are making the right choices for today, you can't trust that the future will keep things private (advances in ML, ubiquitous surveillance) and you don't know that futures isn't here yet.

Personally, I hang out at the fully open end of that spectrum. This has worked out pretty well for me; I don't think I've run into any downsides.

Re: Be anonymous

#33

I mix @realname and @pseudonym accounts. I'm generally pretty careful about what I post under my real name and less so under an alias. However, over time I drop enough clues that people could figure my real identity with a little work. That leaves me with the worst of both worlds. It seems safest to assume that your identity is always tied to everything you do online.

I think with ML getting smarter and people posting (either with their identity or anonymously) more and more content, it will be trivial to crossmatch anonymously posted content to real identities by ML examining "styles" of text: from punctuation to sentence structure to vocabulary use, and it will have an accurate estimation of who that "anonymous" person is.

Re: Be anonymous

#34

The article touches on a good point: one mistake and you're out. It doesn't even have to be your mistake - you didn't choose to put your SSN out there after all, yet here we are. This gave me a radical company idea, on the other end of the spectrum: spam as a service. Something that'll take your name, email, and other things and put it all over the internet in questionable and plausibly denial ways. That way, even wh…

I guess none of these suggestions really work without the last one "Move to Brazil and live in the rainforest" :)

Re: Be anonymous

#35
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I don't know about you, but I don't want to do all of that. [...] I don't recommend being on either extreme of this spectrum. It's a list of extreme techniques for protecting ones' identity online. Of course, completely sanitizing your online presence is difficult, and probably unnecessary. I thought the two lists were a nice rhetorical framing - present a dilemma (total openness vs. total anonymity) and then wiggl…

> It's a list of extreme techniques for protecting ones' identity online. The items I quoted do nothing to protect ones' identity online. Snark is only effective if relevant.

The closed nature of MacOS and Windows means that you have no guarantees (and no audit mechanism) to determine how much the machine is passing your data back to HQ. As the post very clearly states, most people don't need to care - but someone with extreme paranoia has only one obvious choice here.

Your aggressive negativity is far less interesting than this blog, and serves no purpose whatsoever.

Re: Be anonymous

#36

The article touches on a good point: one mistake and you're out. It doesn't even have to be your mistake - you didn't choose to put your SSN out there after all, yet here we are. This gave me a radical company idea, on the other end of the spectrum: spam as a service. Something that'll take your name, email, and other things and put it all over the internet in questionable and plausibly denial ways. That way, even wh…

Name it something catchy…like equiphax

Re: Be anonymous

#37
I don't care about being anon, but I don't want all my info sitting in databases, so I've made done the following and trying to evolve over time and fix gaps that I currently have. This is things I've done...

* Use Brave browser with ublock origins and privacy badger

* Use pihole + unbound to resolve my own DNS and do not use google

* Run wireguard on my home network that I connect to when I'm out and need to use wifi

* Be anti-google as much as possible. I'm still in the process of this, i'll switch my domain based email off of google soon

* Be anti-facebook and delete all accounts (whatsapp and insta included)

* Be anti-reddit

* Be anti-cloud and host everything internally as much as possible (except for encrypted backups, say for video cam footage)

* All of my home automation is local and blocked from the internet. If I want access, I'll connect to my VPN.

* Use signal with disappearing chats to communicate with my friends.

Still a lot to do, but it's a start...

Re: Be anonymous

#38
As careful as some of the things he suggests are...if you're truly wanted by a state-level actor or sufficiently motivated attacker, you won't be able to hide by simply using VPN and Tor. Especially if you're running something with many transactions like AlphaBay. You would need to obfuscate quite a bit more:

- if you're using VPN traffic but most people "around" you aren't, you're a suspicious node; your ISP could easily flag you to your government. If you use wifi at a common point you're likely to be flagged and there isn't an easy way other than keeping on the move. But moving often is another anomalous event, and it's very difficult to do even for Drug Lords ( El Chapo ) or Terrorists that it behooves to do. This puts you in a sort of Zugzwang, to borrow a chess term.

- there's always leakage, for instance, in the way you talk with people in the real world. At some point you send enough communication for sophisticated frequency analysis.

- and there are other patterns of usage that could be used to identify you, like searches or even keyboard frequency on anonymized accounts can be de-anonymized by very specific markers ( ML works! ).

- off ramps for crypto aren't very good. If you're in e.g. Brazil, haha, yeah, good luck spending bitcoin or any other crypto and going unnoticed. Mixers and tumblers will eventually leak and you'll be caught.

- you're very vulnerable to social engineering by people you do business with. one slip where you stop communicating in a transactional mode of communication and that's a weak link in your armor.

In the end, the FBI only has to be right once, and you have to be right every time.

Re: Be anonymous

#39

The article touches on a good point: one mistake and you're out. It doesn't even have to be your mistake - you didn't choose to put your SSN out there after all, yet here we are. This gave me a radical company idea, on the other end of the spectrum: spam as a service. Something that'll take your name, email, and other things and put it all over the internet in questionable and plausibly denial ways. That way, even wh…

[deleted]

Re: Be anonymous

#40
This reminds me of a time I was having a yelling match with a guy on reddit and he started calling me names. I google searched his username and he had used it across multiple sites, several being porn sites, and he also posted his reddit user name on his Facebook and a Facebook search I found his real name and pictures of him. When I called him by his real name and linked a picture of him he immediately changed his tune. In the end he and I both laughed and thought it was funny and he was more curious how I found all those thing. I told him he used the same username across multiple sites including Facebook. He said he was a lot younger and didn’t think of those things when he originally did it. I removed any post where I used his name and tried not to dox him for others to see.
Post reply on HN