Earlier quoted context omitted.
For lack of a political will or the technical know how?
The popular wisdom is that we literally lost some of the technical specs and drawings. A lot of the R&D would have to be redone from scratch... not that it wouldn't make sense to do that anyway, 50+ years later.
SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform space travel
21–30 of 431 posts
Re: SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform space travel
#22The thing that's impressive to me, in addition to the sheer size of these machines, is the engines . The Raptor 2 is groundbreaking. And there's 30+ of them between both stages. It's just incredible, and there's nothing like it that's been done.
> The thing that's impressive to me, in addition to the sheer size of these machines, is the engines. The Raptor 2 is groundbreaking. And there's 30+ of them between both stages. It's just incredible, and there's nothing like it that's been done. I may be wrong, but isn't the reason there are so many engines on their rockets is because SpaceX isn't good at building big rocket engines?
Re: SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform space travel
#23If you're ever in the Houston area, I highly recommend going to see NASA Johnson Space Center. They have a full-size replica (?) Saturn V rocket on its side, you can see. You simply can't grasp how big these rockets are until you see it up close. It's like a tall building blasting off into space. They're humongous. I hope to one day see Starship up close in person as it takes off to space.
I found it depressing. Ships aren't built to stay in the harbor, and rockets aren't built to lie on their side rusting. They say we couldn't build another Saturn V if we tried. Apparently that old saw is true enough, at least for the original contractors.
Re: SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform space travel
#24If you're ever in the Houston area, I highly recommend going to see NASA Johnson Space Center. They have a full-size replica (?) Saturn V rocket on its side, you can see. You simply can't grasp how big these rockets are until you see it up close. It's like a tall building blasting off into space. They're humongous. I hope to one day see Starship up close in person as it takes off to space.
In Huntsville AL they have one stood up outside a museum right off the highway - it’s insane to see
Re: SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform space travel
#25My boss used to keep saying "move fast and break things!" Then a new guy seriously messed up and almost lost us a valuable client. The boss demanded an explanation. I said the new guy moved fast and broke things.
He actually wrote that in the explanation to the client. I haven't heard that phrase from him since.
Re: SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform space travel
#26BTW, if you like the Energia rocket and heavy metal, you might like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVWfqOSdzs4.
This quote (from the article) is astounding:
> [SpaceX] has pulled off 111 Falcon 9 launches in a row without failure
Re: SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform space travel
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
I found it depressing. Ships aren't built to stay in the harbor, and rockets aren't built to lie on their side rusting. They say we couldn't build another Saturn V if we tried. Apparently that old saw is true enough, at least for the original contractors.
For lack of a political will or the technical know how?
2. Many companies that help build those rockets have ceased to exists
3. Technology and tooling have changed substantially
4. Standards to deem a rocket flight worthy for human space flight have changed
Re: SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform space travel
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
For lack of a political will or the technical know how?
The popular wisdom is that we literally lost some of the technical specs and drawings. A lot of the R&D would have to be redone from scratch... not that it wouldn't make sense to do that anyway, 50+ years later.
Re: SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform space travel
#29Re: SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform space travel
#30The thing that's impressive to me, in addition to the sheer size of these machines, is the engines . The Raptor 2 is groundbreaking. And there's 30+ of them between both stages. It's just incredible, and there's nothing like it that's been done.
> The thing that's impressive to me, in addition to the sheer size of these machines, is the engines. The Raptor 2 is groundbreaking. And there's 30+ of them between both stages. It's just incredible, and there's nothing like it that's been done. I may be wrong, but isn't the reason there are so many engines on their rockets is because SpaceX isn't good at building big rocket engines?