Live data from Hacker News

Music Tuned to 440 Hz versus 432 Hz and Health Effects (2019)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

91–93 of 93 posts

Re: Music Tuned to 440 Hz versus 432 Hz and Health Effects (2019)

#91
post #47

I've wondered about the effects of 60 cycle hum. If 440 is an A, I believe 60 is a B. In a lot of popular musical scales this is a dissonant tone. Dissonant tones are associated with anxiety. Is constant 60 cycle hum giving people anxiety?

> I've wondered about the effects of 60 cycle hum. If 440 is an A

If practicing an area with electrical hum, tuning A down to 420 (7 * 60) is definitely a relief.

Re: Music Tuned to 440 Hz versus 432 Hz and Health Effects (2019)

#92

Another hilarious indictment of our academic peer review system

this wasn't peer reviewed. most papers aren't. individual papers getting through would hardly be an indictment besides. people make too much fuss over slips the idea that a system would never pass a single mistake or is otherwise defective is kind of surprising to me, frankly

What makes you think it wasn't peer reviewed? It says it was published in 'Explore', which is a peer reviewed journal. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/explore

Re: Music Tuned to 440 Hz versus 432 Hz and Health Effects (2019)

#93
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Play a B and C together. Dissonance. It is true it's not a very good idea.

A CMaj7 chord has both a B and a C in it and it sounds perfectly fine. You're saying the home chord in the key with the simplest extension is dissonant. That makes no sense. You hear music with two adjacent semitones played together all the time . It's in all jazz music and everything derived from it, which is a huge chunk of modern western music. Seriously, music isn't all just 3-note chords and a B and a C together…

Jazz uses dissonance to create tension in music. Is that much different than stating it causes anxiety?
Post reply on HN