Live data from Hacker News

Music Tuned to 440 Hz versus 432 Hz and Health Effects (2019)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

41–50 of 93 posts

Re: Music Tuned to 440 Hz versus 432 Hz and Health Effects (2019)

#41

This is the only thing you need to really watch about this nonsense: https://youtu.be/EKTZ151yLnk

Funny how we all know the YouTube video is more credible than the peer-reviewed study. If I had to explain why to a stranger I'd really struggle.

Re: Music Tuned to 440 Hz versus 432 Hz and Health Effects (2019)

#42

This is the only thing you need to really watch about this nonsense: https://youtu.be/EKTZ151yLnk

It should have just mentioned that Hz includes the arbitrary definition of 1 second. If we wanted real/natural values, everything should be done in Planck units.

Re: Music Tuned to 440 Hz versus 432 Hz and Health Effects (2019)

#46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why are you like this.

Negative vibrations? Don't tell me that -432Hz is better than +432Hz.

Man, I wish I could downvote these threads. This low-effort karma farming garbage belongs on reddit, not here.

Re: Music Tuned to 440 Hz versus 432 Hz and Health Effects (2019)

#48
post #3

The fact that music tuned to 432 Hz might sound slightly off to listeners might explain the change in attention, which in turn might explain the change in heart rate. It would have been helpful measure other tuning values like 430 or 445 Hz to determine if it's caused by 432 Hz specifically.

Just the act of going through the experiment a second time, now being more familiar with the whole situation, is a plausible cause of lower heart rate all on its own.
Post reply on HN