Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh, this was a new one for me. In case you like narrow but Victor’s not your thing, I can enthusiastically point you towards Iosevka. (That’s also available in Victor’s comparison picker. Nice!)
I love both Iosevka and Victor Mono, but ended using Victor Mono because it has script version for italics.
MonoLisa – A font designed for developers
111–120 of 294 posts
Re: MonoLisa – A font designed for developers
#112Since we are talking about our favourite coding fonts, my personal choice is on Comic Code. I find it very easy to read and better than the other mono comic sans fonts. https://tosche.net/fonts/comic-code
Re: MonoLisa – A font designed for developers
#113The whitespace only ligatures look like an interesting idea and a good alternative to full ones.
Re: MonoLisa – A font designed for developers
#114Re: MonoLisa – A font designed for developers
#115Re: MonoLisa – A font designed for developers
#116I'm going to hop on my hobby horse again for a second: One of their first points is this: >Designing a monospace font is much harder than a traditional, proportional one: being constrained by the same width of all glyphs can result in a boring or unreadable font. And they're absolutely right. But it begs the first-principals question-- why code using a monospace font? Today, every major editor that isn't terminal-bas…
> And they're absolutely right. But it begs the first-principals question-- why code using a monospace font? Today, every major editor that isn't terminal-based supports proportional width fonts beautifully. There was a whole "coding font" family designed around the idea that we should be using proportional fonts for this, and it makes a great case... https://input.djr.com/info/ ...except that just about every time I…
That said, I don't see my lisp coffee caring that much. Let expressions benefit from lining up. Most other code, though? Not sure it matters that much.
Re: MonoLisa – A font designed for developers
#117I'm going to hop on my hobby horse again for a second: One of their first points is this: >Designing a monospace font is much harder than a traditional, proportional one: being constrained by the same width of all glyphs can result in a boring or unreadable font. And they're absolutely right. But it begs the first-principals question-- why code using a monospace font? Today, every major editor that isn't terminal-bas…
Proportional fonts break code navigation, moving vertically is much more important in code than normal text. Also it's harder to line things up, and alignment is a good cue when scanning code.
Re: MonoLisa – A font designed for developers
#118Unfortunately not available to compare on https://www.programmingfonts.org/ While I'm here: Victor Mono has been my programming font of choice for a while now: https://rubjo.github.io/victor-mono/ Oh, look at that, the Victor Mono homepage has a font comparison slider that allows you to compare it to MonoLisa! MonoLisa advertises that it's wider than other monospace fonts, and you can really see that in the compariso…
https://www.programmingfonts.org/#font3270
BTW, I'm also a huge fan of Luxi Mono, but I edit it and add a dot in the middle of the zero to make it different from the O. I like it because it reminds me a bit of the Sun console font (which I always forget the name). I could also go with Go Mono, which is mostly the same, but has a slashed zero.
edit: if you hate my font, just don't use it. You don't have to downvote this. ;-)
Re: MonoLisa – A font designed for developers
#119Is this part about terminals actually true? Or a tad exaggerated for marketing? > MonoLisa uses open forms and terminals (starting and ending points) that are pointing towards the neighboring letters to let the eye follow the line of text fluently. Regardless, I like the font overall. My go-to is Fira Code but this might be worth a try.
(Or, also, that anything like what the site describes actually happens. The entire page is [citation needed].)
Re: MonoLisa – A font designed for developers
#120I am the only one who finds fonts a bit expensive for personal use? It is not a rant, I am not saying it isn't worth it, that font designers can't make money, etc... But that puts it on the same level as tools like Sublime Text or Beyond Compare. For me, it is enough of a turn off not to use a commercial font, especially considering that the free offering is quite good. I totally understand the higher price for comme…
Selling font direct to consumers is extremely bad business model. This doesn’t work. People are not keen on shelling out 100s of dollars when IDEs already come with decent fonts and other thousands of free fonts readily available. This font looks great but most people would argue about marginal benefit. I would hope they would partner with IDE makers and big tech and give them license to use it for their expected rev…
Luckily, everyone can get one at https://github.com/rbanffy/3270font.
Note: shameless plug ;-)