Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't believe in having multiple classes of free citizens. If a free person wants to, they could easily abduct a child, barring them from taking care of kids is a laughable feel-good policy that insults the notion that there should be no free second class citizen. If someone can't be trusted to not abuse children, they need to be jailed or on probation until they can be trusted. Those people can't be trusted in pub…
There is a huge grey area. Statistically, people who have committed a crime are more likely to commit crimes again than those who haven't. That makes for a good argument not to trust them as much, generally speaking. On the other hand, integrating them back into society (something that's lacking in the US) works well for most.
We cant trust them because they re offend, but they re offend because of lack of opportunities created by society not trusting them....
It is certainly true for property crimes, drug crimes, and other such actions.
Violent crimes may be an exception to this, but then to the OP's point, if they are violent why are they out in the population to begin with?