I stopped hopping monospace fonts when I discovered Go Mono. Go Mono does not seem to get blurry even at small sizes. M, m, n always look impeccable. Not so here.
I'm not sure. Maybe something is wrong with the text-rendering in my browser.
11–20 of 294 posts
I stopped hopping monospace fonts when I discovered Go Mono. Go Mono does not seem to get blurry even at small sizes. M, m, n always look impeccable. Not so here.
I'm not sure. Maybe something is wrong with the text-rendering in my browser.
Isn't "increased width" an ungodly sin to the developer lord? If anything, we want to see more in a given space, not less...
I think it increases readability. I need to read what I'm looking at, not a lot of things I'm not looking at.
If you're willing to spend money on a font for coding, then do yourself a favor and take a look at PragmataPro as well. I bought a license (checks notes...) 8 years ago and it has served me very well. If I was not down to pay for a font, then I'd probably use one of Iosevka's forms. Personally, however, it became clear to me that just like my monitor, the font I spend hours looking at every day is also worth some mon…
I like narrow fonts. Barlow is excellent. News Gothic is fantastic. Geo Grotesque is super beautiful. But it just doesn't work for me when a coding font is narrow. Fonts like Iosevka and Pragmata are harder to read than needed and for no clear benefit. Especially when used for projects based on C and derivatives. If you ever find yourself needing to cram more symbols per line onto your screen, it's a sign that there's a coding style problem! Lines simply should be short enough to not require horizontal compression.
Obviously, YMMV, to each their own, etc.
Isn't "increased width" an ungodly sin to the developer lord? If anything, we want to see more in a given space, not less...
Since we are talking about our favourite coding fonts, my personal choice is on Comic Code. I find it very easy to read and better than the other mono comic sans fonts. https://tosche.net/fonts/comic-code
Isn't "increased width" an ungodly sin to the developer lord? If anything, we want to see more in a given space, not less...
> Isn't "increased width" an ungodly sin to the developer lord? If anything we want to see more in a given space, not less... I think it increases readability. I need to read what I'm looking at, not a lot of things I'm not looking at.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Isn't "increased width" an ungodly sin to the developer lord? If anything we want to see more in a given space, not less... I think it increases readability. I need to read what I'm looking at, not a lot of things I'm not looking at.
Not if a part of a line is out of the window right? This makes splitting harder, therefore, reading harder