Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Sidewalks are not a significant additional expense" Depends on your definition of significant and sidewalk. It does add cost, so it's not insignificant (you can observe it with confidence). For states that are already struggling with infrastructure costs, it would not be feasible (look at PA and it's bridges). Most states or municipalities actually have codes that the sidewalk has to follow. So it it's not legally p…
>Depends on your definition of significant and sidewalk. It does add cost, so it's not insignificant (you can observe it with confidence). What a bad-faith definition you're using here. By this definition if you reimbursed a road worker for a penny they dropped during their shift building the road it'd be a significant expense.
Do you have any actual data to support the idea that sidewalks for all roads are a feasible goal?