It's kind of ironic twist of fate and disgrace that something like SciHub needs to be hosted/served from Russia in order to avoid getting squished and destroyed by rent seekers greedy hands.
If anything is a disgrace it's your russophobic comment.
Alexandra Elbakyan, who created SciHub, was born is Kazakhstan (exUSSR) and later studied in Russia where she lives now. I'm proud that Russia is one of the few countries on the planet where American exterritorial law doesn't apply.
It seems to me that this type of tracking, under the guise of guarding rights is against the GDPR = unlawful tracking that they are harassing Google and FB with? Is not justice's sword 2 edged?
(Note that this is all written from a European perspective, applies European Economic Area law and human rights as defined by the Council of Europe (which includes Russia, to everyone's surprise). I know that in the USA everyone is much more pro frontier justice, for example when it comes to pervasive and continual monitoring of employees while at work.) I think it's very arguable that they have a legitimate interest…
Thank you for this cogent analysis. It sounds valid as they probably notify their subscribers that they forbid document release to the wild and use technical means to measure it. The only hope is the usual request to the authors, who have traditionally sent papers to all requests, of course the profs can also pay 'blotgelt', and as long as the fees are small enough or the prof can afford, file it as an open paper. I am encouraged that the open paper concept is gaining traction - in the days when Nobel was alive, his Nobel Prize was in fact created on this basis of open papers freely sent to others - sadly, had he known, he may well have included the open paper concept into his legacy to prevent the blatant rent seeking empires we now see.
That said, curation and acceptance/publication of papers is a service of value and it is needed, at a lower cost as the journals do a job of work to keep totally crappy AI/idiot created papers that get into the totally open journals who are unable to deal with the blizzard of papers they face - the bad get through. There are also the fake fee based online journals where a distressingly small fee gets you online for citation by your coterie of anti vaxxers, nutrition gurus, etc etc. - essentially insoluble, save by intelligent readers who often shed this burden to avoid the waste of time. Fortunately the 'contents **' publications winnow most of these out.
The publishers now encode their papers with individual identifiers, that generationP calls UUIDs on all pdf's. That means they can trace it back to the institution(and perhaps the actual prof?) They have then sent nastygrams to threaten them with fees or loss of access to the institution - potentially serious punishment. What is needed is a way to run the papers through an OCR recognition program to create renewed te…
Does this mean it is trivially easy for any student or employee to make their institution stop paying publishers by getting it banned?
It's kind of ironic twist of fate and disgrace that something like SciHub needs to be hosted/served from Russia in order to avoid getting squished and destroyed by rent seekers greedy hands.
If anything is a disgrace it's your russophobic comment. Alexandra Elbakyan, who created SciHub, was born is Kazakhstan (exUSSR) and later studied in Russia where she lives now. I'm proud that Russia is one of the few countries on the planet where American exterritorial law doesn't apply.
I'm not sure the preceding comment was actually rusophobic. To me it seems you're mostly in agreement in that this content needs to be hosted somewhere safe from the US. It's just that you are proud - because it's hosted in your country - and the previous person is annoyed, because it cannot be hosted in theirs.
It's shame that US or EU don't run open DB for journals that every university should be able to publish as back-up. Also they could create some tools to make research more productive that's free to use.
That we have to rely on single person effort that's risking their freedom to do so is fucking insane.
The publishers now encode their papers with individual identifiers, that generationP calls UUIDs on all pdf's. That means they can trace it back to the institution(and perhaps the actual prof?) They have then sent nastygrams to threaten them with fees or loss of access to the institution - potentially serious punishment. What is needed is a way to run the papers through an OCR recognition program to create renewed te…
Does this mean it is trivially easy for any student or employee to make their institution stop paying publishers by getting it banned?
LOL, student sabotage!. I think the paywalls would extract a penance that maintains their cash flow - remember, Greed is their mantra, may it never ever cease.
If anything is a disgrace it's your russophobic comment. Alexandra Elbakyan, who created SciHub, was born is Kazakhstan (exUSSR) and later studied in Russia where she lives now. I'm proud that Russia is one of the few countries on the planet where American exterritorial law doesn't apply.
I'm not sure the preceding comment was actually rusophobic. To me it seems you're mostly in agreement in that this content needs to be hosted somewhere safe from the US. It's just that you are proud - because it's hosted in your country - and the previous person is annoyed, because it cannot be hosted in theirs.
A typical PhD dissertation these days is 3 publications in high-quality journals. It is explicitly required at most schools.
so there is "prestige" in getting in a reputed journal and not the fact that the paper is peer reviewed by good scientists. the reputation of the journal matters. cool. isnt there a need of change in the "social ideology" of such schools and this whole elitism would go away?
journal prestige does not correlate with review quality. Usually it does, but then there's always reviewer 3...