Live data from Hacker News

Resurrecting the old Wordle for procrastinators

leancrew.com

21–30 of 86 posts

Re: Resurrecting the old Wordle for procrastinators

#21
post #3

This is interesting info, but...what paywall? The old URL https://www.powerlanguage.co.uk/wordle/ still goes directly to the puzzle (redirecting to nytimes.com).

The article is talking about "the inevitable New York Times paywall", not one right now

So where does the "procrastination" come in?

Re: Resurrecting the old Wordle for procrastinators

#22
post #8

The new Wordle has a shorter word list (down from about 12k to about 10k valid guess words). EDIT: both lists are about the same length (12k); a small number of words were removed.

It is shorter, but only by 19 removed words and 6 removed answers. Compare for yourself: https://www.nytimes.com/games/wordle/main.bd4cb59c.js https://web.archive.org/web/20220210034340id_/https://www.po...

Oh, hmm. Perhaps the list has been changed multiple times? It was originally 12972 words (see https://www.poirrier.ca/notes/wordle-optimal/) and was 10638 words as of yesterday. Anyway, some of the words that have been removed are slurs/profanity.

Re: Resurrecting the old Wordle for procrastinators

#23
post #13
post #8

The new Wordle has a shorter word list (down from about 12k to about 10k valid guess words). EDIT: both lists are about the same length (12k); a small number of words were removed.

What's an example of a word that was removed? Any pattern there?

The game has two lists -- one list that includes 'valid guesses' (things you can enter), and one that is a list of things that could actually end up as the solution.

From the possible solutions list, they removed words that have negative associations -- stuff like "slave."

From the guesses list, they mostly removed things like slurs.

Re: Resurrecting the old Wordle for procrastinators

#24

This is interesting info, but...what paywall? The old URL https://www.powerlanguage.co.uk/wordle/ still goes directly to the puzzle (redirecting to nytimes.com).

The redirect target has some obnoxious stuff like a cookie banner as well as outright malware like Google Tag Manager (which will no doubt load further malware if it is allowed to load itself).

Re: Resurrecting the old Wordle for procrastinators

#25
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The article is talking about "the inevitable New York Times paywall", not one right now

So where does the "procrastination" come in?

Not saving the original HTML and JavaScript before the redirect was established.

Re: Resurrecting the old Wordle for procrastinators

#26

Easier still, try one of the alternatives like Wordii: https://frequal.com/wordii Bonus features: * Streak stats to share * Try new words faster

I like this one! Clean and minimalist. Did you make it?

Shameless self-plug, but if anyone is interested in alternatives with an added challenge, I made https://squareword.org where you guess words to uncover a word square of 5x5 letters. Feedback has been positive and looks like user numbers are picking up, doubling about once per week so far.

Re: Resurrecting the old Wordle for procrastinators

#27
post #11
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The article is talking about "the inevitable New York Times paywall", not one right now

I keep seeing that but I’d be amazed if NYT paywalled it. They’ll just add derivative versions and stuff like that for subscribers. Much like how their daily mini crossword is free to all.

When the NYT announced the purchase, they said Wordle would "initially" remain free to play.

If I told you that tonight I will "initially" be watching Evil Dead II, you're going to have some questions about what I'm doing afterward.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/31/business/media/new-york-t...

Re: Resurrecting the old Wordle for procrastinators

#28
post #8

The new Wordle has a shorter word list (down from about 12k to about 10k valid guess words). EDIT: both lists are about the same length (12k); a small number of words were removed.

Why?

There are two lists: guesses you are allowed to make, and possible solutions from the puzzle. From the solutions list they removed some words that had different British and American spellings, as well as some words with negative associations, like "slave."

From the possible guesses list, the words removed appeared to mostly be quite offensive slurs.

Re: Resurrecting the old Wordle for procrastinators

#29
I don't know what has changed about the game, but running it in my phone (Pixel 4, Firefox mobile) has become near impossible.

Every other action freezes the entire page while some event gets processed. And by event I mean like "clicked the 'L' button", the most basic actions in the game.

I guess I'll just stick with the alternatives from now on.

Re: Resurrecting the old Wordle for procrastinators

#30
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is shorter, but only by 19 removed words and 6 removed answers. Compare for yourself: https://www.nytimes.com/games/wordle/main.bd4cb59c.js https://web.archive.org/web/20220210034340id_/https://www.po...

Oh, hmm. Perhaps the list has been changed multiple times? It was originally 12972 words (see https://www.poirrier.ca/notes/wordle-optimal/ ) and was 10638 words as of yesterday. Anyway, some of the words that have been removed are slurs/profanity.

I believe you're mixing it up. There are two arrays of words in the source code. One that contains all the solutions in order, and one that contains all the possible words without repeating any words in the solutions list

So the 10638 words are the set of all possible guesses minus the set of all the solutions.

Post reply on HN