Sci-Hub statistics and database
31–40 of 150 posts
Re: Sci-Hub statistics and database
#32Did Sci-Hub start working again? Last time I checked it wasn't adding new papers because of some legal thing going on in India.
Re: Sci-Hub statistics and database
#33Alexandra should get the Nobel prize.
Re: Sci-Hub statistics and database
#34Did Sci-Hub start working again? Last time I checked it wasn't adding new papers because of some legal thing going on in India.
Re: Sci-Hub statistics and database
#35Re: Sci-Hub statistics and database
#36Re: Sci-Hub statistics and database
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is note worthy that most of physics (at least high energy physics) ist published on arxiv.org and open access. I don't know if sci hub bothers with publications that are available freely from an official source.
> published on arxiv.org and open access Don't use the term "open access" like this. A paper published on arXiv is free to read, and was freely published. "Open access" is a scam by the big publishers, where they don't take money from the readers , but make the authors pay. Or, putting it another way, anyone can pay their way in those journals and publish (sometimes sub par) papers.
Re: Sci-Hub statistics and database
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is note worthy that most of physics (at least high energy physics) ist published on arxiv.org and open access. I don't know if sci hub bothers with publications that are available freely from an official source.
> published on arxiv.org and open access Don't use the term "open access" like this. A paper published on arXiv is free to read, and was freely published. "Open access" is a scam by the big publishers, where they don't take money from the readers , but make the authors pay. Or, putting it another way, anyone can pay their way in those journals and publish (sometimes sub par) papers.
Re: Sci-Hub statistics and database
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
I mean, even if you limited yourself to just the Peace prize (arguably the most controversial), you'd still have to reconcile your statement with the fact that people like Malala Yousafzai have won.