Show HN: Yode-Nvim – Focused Code Editing for Neovim
1–10 of 23 posts
Re: Show HN: Yode-Nvim – Focused Code Editing for Neovim
#2Does anyone know if this exists for Emacs? I use both nvim and Emacs but primarily Emacs and would love to have this on both.
Re: Show HN: Yode-Nvim – Focused Code Editing for Neovim
#3Interesting for the “GIF” section to have links to .mp4 videos — the “GIF” word now seems to be synonymous to short playable animations. Love that the author did that though, I’ve seen too many repos with multiple giant (~10MB) GIFs on the README and burn my mobile data plan.
Re: Show HN: Yode-Nvim – Focused Code Editing for Neovim
#4This looks great, nicely done! I didn’t know I needed this :) Does anyone know if this exists for Emacs? I use both nvim and Emacs but primarily Emacs and would love to have this on both.
However, this plugin seems to be a little fancier and instead creates different buffers for each selection. The analogous feature set in Emacs are indirect buffers. Try binding a key to run the clone-indirect-buffer and narrow-to-region commands in sequence.
This library might help too: https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/NarrowIndirect
Re: Show HN: Yode-Nvim – Focused Code Editing for Neovim
#5Re: Show HN: Yode-Nvim – Focused Code Editing for Neovim
#6An off-topic comment: Interesting for the “GIF” section to have links to .mp4 videos — the “GIF” word now seems to be synonymous to short playable animations. Love that the author did that though, I’ve seen too many repos with multiple giant (~10MB) GIFs on the README and burn my mobile data plan.
https://i.imgur.com/DgQLXqj.png
EDIT: looks like there is already an issue about it. https://github.com/hoschi/yode-nvim/issues/4
Re: Show HN: Yode-Nvim – Focused Code Editing for Neovim
#7Re: Show HN: Yode-Nvim – Focused Code Editing for Neovim
#8Re: Show HN: Yode-Nvim – Focused Code Editing for Neovim
#9How does Yode compare with tree-sitter?
Re: Show HN: Yode-Nvim – Focused Code Editing for Neovim
#10What’s the advantage of this over creating splits and navigating to the relevant code? This is what I do all the time, having a hard time understanding how this would improve that.