Most of these cancers seem to hit people aged 40-60, and I’m not sure from the article but I think they are saying if you have this cancer smoking weed might speed it’s growth, but not that it is a cause of the cancer in the first place. If that’s right I don’t get why this is being described as a crisis. Just suggest patients don’t smoke if they are diagnosed with this cancer. Source for the age claim: https://pubme…
Marijuana accelerates growth of HPV-related head and neck cancer (2020)
101–110 of 146 posts
Re: Marijuana accelerates growth of HPV-related head and neck cancer (2020)
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree. I was kind of shocked at the number of people I knew who thought it was bad before suddenly decided it wasn’t anymore and started consuming it after it was legalized in the states I frequent. Just because something is legal does not make it a good idea to do; by that token just because something is illegal does not necessarily make it bad to do (other than legal problems that is). I think the important thing…
You make a lot of valid points but this sentence: > I say legalize all the “drugs” and let people decide for themselves whether or not to be morons. Is probably a bit too spicy. You say the government robs us of agency but you know what else does? Addiction. It’s not bad for a government to put regulations in place for dangerous substances. I do, however, agree with the subtext that it should be _decriminalized_.
Nothing quite robs one of agency like death.
Before fentanyl, I don't think I would be for full legalization. At this point though non-legalization seems immoral.
Re: Marijuana accelerates growth of HPV-related head and neck cancer (2020)
#103So, if HPV is a sexually transmitted disease, and you are in a monogamous relationship, and you and your partner don't have it, what's to worry about here?
[1]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33101476/#:~:text=The%20hori....
Re: Marijuana accelerates growth of HPV-related head and neck cancer (2020)
#104Most of these cancers seem to hit people aged 40-60, and I’m not sure from the article but I think they are saying if you have this cancer smoking weed might speed it’s growth, but not that it is a cause of the cancer in the first place. If that’s right I don’t get why this is being described as a crisis. Just suggest patients don’t smoke if they are diagnosed with this cancer. Source for the age claim: https://pubme…
I thought folks often smoke marijuana to cope with nausea induced by chemo therapy. That might be part of the “crisis” aspect.
[1]https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-017-0873-x
Re: Marijuana accelerates growth of HPV-related head and neck cancer (2020)
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
The fact that you really have to hunt for these deaths, and that even seemingly-rigorous medical studies on the question can only dig up a total of three cases, combined with the fact that hundreds of millions of people (at least) use cannabis very regularly, really tells you all you need to know. Cannabis use simply is not fatal, or even highly dangerous, under all normal conditions. Sure, yes, you can find a few 1…
I didn't have to "hunt" for anything -- I am a chronic sufferer of CHS and have almost died from it on a number of occasions. And the deaths I linked to are only a handful among many suspected ones, for an illness which is just starting to be properly investigated. ERs have been flooded with severe cases of CHS over the past two decades. It's not just three people dying in rare cases, it's potentially 2.75 million[1]…
Don’t you think there might be something else going on there?
Re: Marijuana accelerates growth of HPV-related head and neck cancer (2020)
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ah, okay, I didn’t realize that you meant using healing crystals instead of vaccines. I read it as: parents using healing crystals at all is as worrisome as not vaccinating their children.
It also is, children shouldn't be misled by their parents about scams like healing crystals because they will believe it as they are children. Later in life they might resort to crystals instead of getting medical attention.
Re: Marijuana accelerates growth of HPV-related head and neck cancer (2020)
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
I didn't have to "hunt" for anything -- I am a chronic sufferer of CHS and have almost died from it on a number of occasions. And the deaths I linked to are only a handful among many suspected ones, for an illness which is just starting to be properly investigated. ERs have been flooded with severe cases of CHS over the past two decades. It's not just three people dying in rare cases, it's potentially 2.75 million[1]…
> 155 met inclusion criteria as smoking 20 or more days per month. That is insane.
Re: Marijuana accelerates growth of HPV-related head and neck cancer (2020)
#108Cannabis seems like it isn't all its hyped up to be -- and the $MJ cannabis ETF is down 70% since its 2019 peak.
I agree. I was kind of shocked at the number of people I knew who thought it was bad before suddenly decided it wasn’t anymore and started consuming it after it was legalized in the states I frequent. Just because something is legal does not make it a good idea to do; by that token just because something is illegal does not necessarily make it bad to do (other than legal problems that is). I think the important thing…
Well, yeah. Hiding a Jew in 1940s Germany or a native child in 1960s Canada was totally illegal. Democracy functions when the individual is the moral authority because large groups reliably become sociopathic. I suspect that's baked into our biology to some degree, why would we historically form a very large group absent the kind of existential crisis that might require sociopathic behaviour?
Re: Marijuana accelerates growth of HPV-related head and neck cancer (2020)
#109Re: Marijuana accelerates growth of HPV-related head and neck cancer (2020)
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not going to be easy. https://www.christianpost.com/news/conservatives-raise-red-f... https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2011/sep/16/michele-ba...
Children of such people have been dealt an awful hand.
On the facet of risk towards a particular form of cancer, it might be an awful hand.
On the fact of mental health, it might be a better hand than others: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releases/religious-u...
At the moment, since mental health seems to be a bigger issue than cancer (according to the media), it’s not trivial to define what an awful hand is :)